Article
James F. Collins
{
"authors": [
"James F. Collins"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Caucasus",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
STARTing Over
The United States and Russia have officially signed the new START Treaty, setting up the necessary framework to reduce the world’s nuclear weapon stockpile by almost a third.
Published on Apr 8, 2010
Source: Russia Today: The Alyona Show
The United States and Russia have officially signed the new START agreement, setting up the necessary framework to reduce the world’s nuclear weapon stockpile by almost a third. Ahead of the nuclear security summit in Washington, the world was focused on Prague as U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedevey set the tone for international nuclear disarmament. James Collins participated in a live discussion on Russia Today about the importance of the new START agreement.
The new START agreement is a historic treaty which puts the world on the right trajectory, asserted Collins. He commented that people were skeptical about the first START agreement, but it has proven to be quite an achievement, as demonstrated by the huge reductions of nuclear arsenals that took place under that agreement over the course of fifteen years. The new START agreement will be important; it provides a legally binding set of rules under which the United States and Russia will continue to manage their nuclear arsenals and build them down.
The treaty has enhanced the credibility of both President Obama and President Medvedev, added Collins. It proves that both Russia and the United States are serious about controlling nuclear proliferation and insuring that nuclear materials and nuclear weapons do not fall into the hands of terrorists, non-state actors, or rogue states. The threat of terrorists gaining access to nuclear weapons, Collins suggested, will be among the key issues discussed at the nuclear security summit in Washington, D.C. this week.
Collins concluded, “What encourages me is that you now have real discussion about the idea that you will have a world with no nuclear weapons. That just wasn’t the case fifteen or twenty years ago. And while we are long ways from it, I don’t think we should minimize at all the significance of this step by the two powers who have to work together in order to get us anywhere closer to a realistic possibility of having no nuclear weapons.”
About the Author
James F. Collins
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program; Diplomat in Residence
Ambassador Collins was the U.S. ambassador to the Russian Federation from 1997 to 2001 and is an expert on the former Soviet Union, its successor states, and the Middle East.
- Daunting Challenges and Glimmers of Hope in Ukraine
- The Game Changer: Cooperative Missile DefenseCommentary
Dmitri Trenin, James F. Collins
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?Commentary
Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle EastCommentary
The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
- Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?Commentary
It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.
Mikayel Zolyan
- Will Hungary’s New Leader Really Change EU Policy on Russia and Ukraine?Commentary
Orbán created an image for himself as virtually the only opponent of aid to Ukraine in the entire EU. But in reality, he was simply willing to use his veto to absorb all the backlash, allowing other opponents to remain in the shadows.
Maksim Samorukov
- Is There a Place for Russia in the New Race Back to the Moon?Commentary
Despite having the resources and expertise, the Russian space industry missed the opportunity to offer the United States or China a mutually rewarding partnership in the lunar race.
Georgy Trishkin
