• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Climate Change",
    "Security"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

The Future: 10 Questions

Today’s emergencies should not distract policy makers from thinking about the long-term challenges that will define the world—for the better or the worse—in the coming century.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Oct 30, 2011

Source: El Pais

The Future: 10 QuestionsToday's emergencies are crowding the thinking about the long-term. The anxiety over Europe's economic crisis, the political infighting in the United States, social unrest in many other countries, and a possible slowdown of growth in China, are just some of the concerns about the immediate future that are preventing us from thinking beyond the coming weeks or months. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the think tank where I work, has just celebrated its 100th anniversary. Spurred on by the centenary, we are considering the dilemmas that will define the world in the coming century. Many will quickly dismiss such an exercise. Why bother? It is not very likely that the answers will turn out to be true and, in any case, we will not be around to see if we got it wrong - or to deal with the consequences. Yet, these are questions that stimulate interesting ideas and synthesize our options in a number of critical areas. Just thinking about alternative futures and the factors that will shape them helps us better understand where we are, where we might be heading, and which efforts are needed to take us closer to the more desirable scenarios.

These are, then, 10 questions about the future, which I present in no particular order of importance, and, in several cases, are clearly linked.

1. Will we be able to limit the increase in global temperature to 3ºC, or will it rise a further 8ºC or more? If the increase reaches or passes 8ºC, the planet and its inhabitants will be facing unprecedented challenges.

2. Will there be 16 billion inhabitants or will there be just six billion of us living on planet Earth? This is the range of possibilities that the United Nations estimates with respect to the size of the global population in 2100, depending on fertility indices and other factors.

3. How many countries will have nuclear weapons by 2100? None? Twenty-five? This is the number of countries that experts reckon could have atomic bombs in the coming decades if they continue to develop their nuclear programs in this direction and if the rest of the world lets them. Today there are nine "nuclear weapons" countries.

4. What will be the model of government in the future: democracies as in Europe, the United States, India and Brazil, or authoritarian regimes such as those in China and Russia?

5. Will the rapid expansion of the middle class that we have seen over the last decade in the poorest and most-populated countries continue? Or will deep inequality be the norm?

6. Will Islam become the source of tension and conflict, or will it renovate, transforming itself into a force for peace and development?

7. Will the internet and cyberspace evolve as benign forces or will they be a source of new threats?

8. One of the characteristics of the 20th century was the creation of many new nations. Will state-failure be the defining characteristic of the 21st century?

9. Will globalization continue, driven by technologies that shorten distances and communication costs, and by public policies that encourage international integration? Or on the contrary, will social unrest produced by globalization feed nationalism and protectionism, blocking the movement of people, products, money, and ideas?

10. Will economic, political, military and social power be more or less concentrated?

It is obvious that this list of factors that will define the future is incomplete. Many are missing, and we can all think of other challenges we will face. But these 10 should probably be included on any list. At the very least they should serve to begin an indispensible conversation; one that is more urgent than we might like to think.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyClimate ChangeSecurityUnited StatesNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Building Mini-Refineries Will Not Solve Russia’s Gasoline Crisis

    Official discussions about mini oil refineries are unlikely to come to anything—but the mere fact they’re happening reveals the regime is failing to deliver a functioning economy.  

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?

    Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.

      Leonid Bershidsky

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s Weakness

    The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could Ukraine Succeed in Torpedoing Putin’s Approval Ratings?

    It is not a phenomenon unique to Russia that the public of a country at war (even the aggressor) enduring airstrikes will not overturn its government but rather show solidarity with it and blame its woes on the enemy.

      Vladislav Gorin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Simmering U.S.-Iran Conflict Is Moscow’s Ideal Outcome

    Ongoing uncertainty in the Middle East allows Moscow to both increase its influence in Tehran and continue to enjoy the financial windfall of higher oil prices.

      Nikita Smagin

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.