Commentary
Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Can a Defense Merger Change Britain’s Attitude Toward Europe?
A merger between the European aerospace giant EADS and its British rival, BAE Systems, could be a catalyst for Europe taking a hard look at not only its defense but also its research and development sectors.
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Oct 1, 2012
Source: New York Times
With the British government now so extraordinarily anti-European, it is hard to see any future BAE-EADS tie-up making a difference.
BAE has had a special relationship with the United States as one of the few European defense manufacturers to supply the Defense Department with cutting-edge military equipment.
Yet with defense spending being cut, even in the United States, BAE is now looking to EADS for growth, especially in the civil aircraft sector.What an irony for BAE, which a few years ago sold its share in EADS.
A merger should surely provide BAE and the British government with some influence over the future direction of EADS. BAE would only hold a minority stake and one would only expect lots of political interference by France and Germany in the joint company. Along with Spain, they are the shareholders in EADS — and famous for wrangling to get the maximum of jobs in their own countries.
But, say analysts, there is a bigger, strategic interest at stake for Europe and for Britain: A merger would make Europe a very serious competitor to the United States, a point I make in my column this week.
Boeing, the American aerospace giant, is already a fierce competitor with Airbus. But with BAE’s state-of-the-art military technology, Europe could find new markets in Asia and elsewhere.
A merger could, in the longer term, also be a catalyst for Europe taking a hard look at not only its defense but also its research and development sectors. The former is hampered by duplication, the latter by a lack of funding. Both have been a brake on Europe’s ability to decide what kind of security and defense policy it needs for the 21st century.
Of course, British conservative lawmakers would balk at the idea that a BAE-EADS deal could lead to a more integrated European defense policy.
Yet Britain’s conservative government is pushing the deal because it knows that it presents the only hope for keeping a national stake in a major aerospace company.
British conservative prime ministers, from Edward Heath to John Major, have found over time that their country could not do without Europe. The BAE-EADS deal may be a similar moment of truth for David Cameron.
About the Author
Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying
- Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European PopulistsCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Russia Is Exporting Its Fuel Crisis to Central AsiaCommentary
When faced with fuel shortages in the past, Central Asian governments could always count on additional supplies from Moscow. That safety net no longer exists.
Galiya Ibragimova
- What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?Commentary
Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.
Leonid Bershidsky
- Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the KremlinCommentary
Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.
Konstantin Skorkin
- Moldova’s Ruling Party PAS Must Graduate From Crisis Management to State GovernanceCommentary
Whether PAS can refocus on the unfinished business of state-building may ultimately prove more consequential for Moldova’s European future than the pace of its accession negotiations.
Balázs Jarábik
- Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s WeaknessCommentary
The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.
Artyom Shraibman
