U.S.-China Trade Conflict Is New Status-Quo

{
  "authors": [
    "Evan A. Feigenbaum"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China’s Foreign Relations",
    "U.S.-China Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

In The Media

U.S.-China Trade Conflict Is New Status-Quo

Both the United States and China are coming out of political transitions to face endemic trade conflicts and domestic structural adjustments.

By Evan A. Feigenbaum

Published on Dec 19, 2012

Source: CNBC

Speaking on CNBC, Carnegie's Evan Feigenbaum explained that both the United States and China are at an important moment in their economic relationship. He argued that trade conflict is endemic in the current U.S.-China relationship. However, he added, both countries are also facing domestic structural adjustments that, if dealt with separately, could help the two economies reach a more complimentary place.

About the Author

Evan A. Feigenbaum

Vice President for Studies

Evan A. Feigenbaum is vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he oversees work at its offices in Washington, New Delhi, and Singapore on a dynamic region encompassing both East Asia and South Asia. He served twice as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and advised two Secretaries of State and a former Treasury Secretary on Asia.

Recent Work

Commentary
Is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Performance Art or Meaningful Collaboration?
- Evan A. Feigenbaum
Commentary
In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in Asia
- Evan A. Feigenbaum

Economy Trade North America United States East Asia China

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Price Analysis Shows China Holds Upper Hand in Russia Gas Supply Talks
A leak of Russian gas price data helps establish that China is paying Russia far less than Central Asian countries and Gazprom’s former European customers.
Sergey Vakulenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?
Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.
Sergey Vakulenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Stalled at the Front, Russia Seeks to Undermine Ukraine’s Economic Capacity
Russian strikes are weakening the economy sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Closing the growing funding gap will require more European support and politically contentious reforms in Kyiv.
Balázs Jarábik
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Who Is Funding Russia’s War in the 2027 Budget?
For every ruble allocated to social policy, health, and education in 2027, double that amount is earmarked for the army, the police, and the security services.
Alexandra Prokopenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
International Demand for Russia’s Arctic Shipping Route Is Unlikely to Last
Cargo traffic through Russia’s Northern Sea Route has increased because of the disruption caused by the conflict in the Middle East, the Ukraine war, and U.S.-China tensions.
Mikhail Korostikov

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Price Analysis Shows China Holds Upper Hand in Russia Gas Supply Talks

A leak of Russian gas price data helps establish that China is paying Russia far less than Central Asian countries and Gazprom’s former European customers.

Sergey Vakulenko

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?

Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.

Sergey Vakulenko

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Stalled at the Front, Russia Seeks to Undermine Ukraine’s Economic Capacity

Russian strikes are weakening the economy sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Closing the growing funding gap will require more European support and politically contentious reforms in Kyiv.

Balázs Jarábik

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Who Is Funding Russia’s War in the 2027 Budget?

For every ruble allocated to social policy, health, and education in 2027, double that amount is earmarked for the army, the police, and the security services.

Alexandra Prokopenko

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

International Demand for Russia’s Arctic Shipping Route Is Unlikely to Last

Cargo traffic through Russia’s Northern Sea Route has increased because of the disruption caused by the conflict in the Middle East, the Ukraine war, and U.S.-China tensions.

Mikhail Korostikov