In The Media
Petr Topychkanov
{
"authors": [
"Petr Topychkanov"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Civil Society"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
National Unity Does Not Need a Special Day
There is no need to invent a special day like the National Unity Day for strengthening national identity, because one day in a year cannot change people's vision of their nation. This is an everyday job for the citizens at all levels of Russian society.
Published on Nov 8, 2013
If the authorities have decided to invent the National Unity Day, it can mean that they believe in the need for special activities in the field of nation-building.
As it usually happens in Russia, the idea is correct, but its realization is poor. A special day, dedicated to the national unity, looks like the Women’s Day on March 8, when many Russian men buy flowers and gifts for their women. The question is whether there is a need for a special day to buy flowers for your woman? Of course, there is none. It can be done as often as you want.
The same can be said about the National Unity Day. There is no need to invent a special day for strengthening national identity, because one day in a year cannot change people's vision of their nation. This is an everyday job for the citizens at all levels of our society.
No doubt, the state has its own role. It has a lot of means of nation-building policy, including the state system of education, state museums and galleries, state-sponsored events, and so on.
I have not mentioned the armed forces and political parties, usually regarded as the instruments of nation-building policy, because the effectiveness of these instruments is not so evident.
The United Russia Party is a good example. Sometimes it seems that this party exists in a parallel reality, which has nothing to do with the Russian nation. Other parties do not differ a lot.
As for the army, it is a classic example of the nation-building instruments. The military history, the memories about heroes, the military service can help build the national identity. And they do this every day.
But there are a lot of problems in the armed forces today, which can destroy people's expectations, replacing their pride of their nation with disappointment. Unsuccessful launches of space rockets, widely discussed in our society, can prove this.
Even if the authorities learn how to use the nation-building instruments in a proper way, it does not mean that someday they will be able to state that their mission has been accomplished.
The nation-building is an infinite mission, firstly because of a change of generations, secondly because of the continuous development of the political environment, and thirdly because of an on-going cultural transformation of the society.
About the Author
Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.
- Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System
- Premonition of Nuclear ThreatIn The Media
Petr Topychkanov
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Why Has Kazakhstan Started Deporting Political Activists?Commentary
The current U.S. indifference to human rights means Astana no longer has any incentive to refuse extradition requests from its authoritarian neighbors—including Russia.
Temur Umarov
- Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?Commentary
Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.
Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov
- What Does War in the Middle East Mean for Russia–Iran Ties?Commentary
If the regime in Tehran survives, it could be obliged to hand Moscow significant political influence in exchange for supplies of weapons and humanitarian aid.
Nikita Smagin
- How Trump’s Wars Are Boosting Russian Oil ExportsCommentary
The interventions in Iran and Venezuela are in keeping with Trump’s strategy of containing China, but also strengthen Russia’s position.
Mikhail Korostikov
- How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?Commentary
Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.
Nikita Smagin
