Commentary
Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [
"Transatlantic Cooperation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "EP",
"programs": [
"Europe"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"North America",
"United States",
"Western Europe",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"Security"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
The Crisis in Ukraine is Testing the Limits of the US Relationship With Europe
During his trip to Europe, U.S. President Barack Obama has tried to rally his European counterparts to form a united front against Moscow’s annexation of Crimea.
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Mar 26, 2014
Source: Public Radio International
President Obama's trip to Europe this week has been all about Russia — and rallying European allies to form a united front against Moscow's annexation of Crimea.
During a visit to a US war cemetery in Belgium on Wednesday, Obama felt the need to remind Europeans that "freedom isn't free." He urged them to reverse cuts in their national defense spending. He also warned Russia not to think about further annexation of territory. But it's been heavy going.
Judy Dempsey calls it "very nice rhetoric." She is a senior associate in Europe with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “[He's] trying to rally the troops — literally. Trying to rally NATO to spend more on defense, and trying to rally the Europeans and strengthen their backbone when it comes to Russia.”“But,” she adds, “I’m not sure this rhetoric will get far. Europeans have been united thus far, but they have not been as forceful as the United States has been when it comes to dealing with Putin.”
Despite the renewed emphasis on the importance of Europe, Washington is not pivoting back toward Europe, argues Dempsey. “America’s strategic interests are in the Asia-Pacific. There’s no doubt about this. Europe is too wealthy, too prosperous, too stable to justify a re-pivot,” she says.
Dempsey feels Obama needed to deliver a different message to Europeans . “What he should have said is, ‘Look, if you want the trans-Atlantic relationship to survive and prosper, [then] look after your own security. We will help you when needed, but look after your own defense spending, and where your interests are.’ And he didn’t say this.”
This interview was originally aired on Public Radio International.
About the Author
Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Germany’s Shattered Consensus
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is SayingCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Leaving Russian-Speakers Without Representation Is a Risk for LatviaCommentary
If the Russian-speaking community in Latvia cannot articulate their interests without being seen as disloyal, they could end up embracing a pro-Kremlin agenda.
Sergejs Potapkins
- As It Turns 25, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Reflects the New World OrderCommentary
With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.
Temur Umarov
- Russia Is Exporting Its Fuel Crisis to Central AsiaCommentary
When faced with fuel shortages in the past, Central Asian governments could always count on additional supplies from Moscow. That safety net no longer exists.
Galiya Ibragimova
- Russia Is Approaching a Political CrossroadsCommentary
Two divergent trends—Putin’s hardline vision of how to prosecute the war in Ukraine, and a growing desire for change in Russia—could tear the regime apart.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?Commentary
Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.
Leonid Bershidsky
