• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Pakistan",
    "East Asia",
    "South Korea",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

The Great Game Folio: Peripheral Diplomacy

Although geography limits New Delhi’s role in East Asia, Modi is betting India can win friends and partners through active engagement.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on May 19, 2015

Source: Indian Express

After much bonhomie in Beijing, PM Narendra Modi has moved on to raise India’s strategic profile in two key states on China’s periphery — Mongolia and South Korea. Although geography limits New Delhi’s role in East Asia, Modi is betting India can win friends and partners through active engagement. China does the same in South Asia.

President Xi Jinping was showcasing China’s growing clout on the subcontinent when he travelled to Sri Lanka and the Maldives after visiting India last September. He also chose to spend a day in Pakistan last month before receiving Modi. China has long questioned India’s claim to an exclusive sphere of influence in the subcontinent. China’s outreach to Bhutan, the Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka has generated much concern in Delhi.

Beijing’s attempt to cultivate India’s neighbours and Delhi’s efforts to do the same in China’s backyard reflect an important feature of international relations. All major powers want to consolidate their primacy in their immediate neighbourhood and challenge the dominance of a rival power. This law of international politics has a corollary. Small countries next to big powers seek a measure of strategic autonomy by reaching out to distant powers. This tension varies from region to region.

In Latin America, the US has faced few challengers to its primacy. In Europe, the West successfully rolled back Russian influence after the Cold War; President Vladimir Putin is now trying to restore it. In Central Asia, shared distrust of the West has nudged Moscow and Beijing towards a regional duopoly through the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. In East Asia, China is challenging the US’s economic and strategic domination.

Mutual Encirclement

In South Asia, Delhi and Beijing have long accused each other of “strategic encirclement”. The rise of China and the emergence of India has sharpened this trend. It is no wonder India views China’s “one belt, one road” with much geopolitical suspicion. Similarly, China does not view with kindness the ideas for an “Indo-Pacific Corridor” that India wants to develop with America and Japan.

Much in the manner that India’s neighbours are ready to cosy up to Beijing, so would many of China’s neighbours — from Mongolia to Vietnam and Myanmar to the Philippines — like to deepen ties with Delhi. The problem for India has not been the lack of opportunity, but the political will and resources to play the great game. Modi seems more willing than some of his recent predecessors.

But the Sino-Indian regional rivalry need not necessarily end in conflict. There has been growing recognition in both Delhi and Beijing that they need to have better understanding of each other’s policies and intentions. As Modi said in Beijing, India and China “should be sensitive to each other’s interests; strengthen mutual trust and confidence; continue to manage our differences with maturity”.

Pakistan Challenge

The joint statement issued by Modi and Xi captures some of this spirit. Despite the presumption of Sino-Indian rivalry in the subcontinent, Modi said he and Chinese leaders have “agreed to broaden cooperation in Saarc”. Even more important was Modi’s declaration in Beijing that “our decision to enhance strategic communication and coordination on our region is especially significant”. Modi is conscious of the need for greater regional connectivity and has left room for future collaboration with Beijing on regional transborder projects.

Although Pakistan has long been a problem in Sino-Indian relations, Modi explored the potential for limiting Pakistan’s salience in Delhi’s engagement with Beijing. As he emphasised, “terrorism is a shared threat” and that “peace and progress in Afghanistan benefits us both”. Amid a rapidly deteriorating situation in Afghanistan and growing doubts about Rawalpindi’s ability, China is seeking a leadership role in Afghanistan. In the past, Delhi would have seen this as a manifestation of the “Sino-Pak nexus”. Modi, instead, is seeking to expand the dialogue with China on the biggest emerging challenge to South Asian security.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicyAsiaSouth AsiaIndiaPakistanEast AsiaSouth KoreaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?

    Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Can the Disparate Threads of Ukraine Peace Talks Be Woven Together?

    Putin is stalling, waiting for a breakthrough on the front lines or a grand bargain in which Trump will give him something more than Ukraine in exchange for concessions on Ukraine. And if that doesn’t happen, the conflict could be expanded beyond Ukraine.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor Moscow

    Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.  

      Ruslan Suleymanov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Signs of an Imminent End to the Ukraine War Are Deceptive

    The main source of Russian aggression is a profound mistrust of the West and the firm belief that it intends to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia. As long as this fear persists, the war will not end.

      Tatiana Stanovaya

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Japan’s “Militarist Turn” and What It Means for Russia

    For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.

      James D.J. Brown

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.