• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Farea Al-Muslimi"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Gulf",
    "Yemen",
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Questions Remain After Adviser Makes a Diplomatic Career Shift

The appointment of Ahmed Awad Bin Mubarak as Yemeni Ambassador to the United States puts an end to a three-year vacuum in the Yemeni foreign service. But his new role as a diplomat raises many questions.

Link Copied
By Farea Al-Muslimi
Published on Jul 20, 2015

Source: National

This month, Yemen’s exiled president, Abdrabu Mansur Hadi, received a letter indicating that his choice for ambassador to the United States, Ahmed Awad Bin Mubarak, had been approved by the United States government.

The confirmation puts an end to a three-year vacuum in the Yemeni foreign service, dating back to 2011 when former ambassador Abdulwahab Al Hijri—who was well known in diplomatic and social circles in Washington and was former president Ali Abdullah Saleh’s son-in-law—stepped down.

Bin Mubarak is relatively new to diplomacy. However, he has played a key role in the Yemeni government, serving as secretary general of the National Dialogue Conference, and, later, as chief of staff in Hadi’s office.

It is all a long way from his student days working with the Baath party in Iraq.

Washington was a sponsor of the now-failed transitional process in Yemen after the fall of Saleh, and Bin Mubarak had been one of its key figures. His new role as a diplomat has raised many questions in Yemen and beyond.

Bin Mubarak quickly came to prominence following the Arab Spring in Yemen. He had close relations with western embassies, and—until their relationship soured earlier this year—had the ear of the former UN envoy to Yemen, Jamal Benomar.

 On January 17, the Houthis began their coup in Yemen by kidnapping Bin Mubarak and holding him captive for 10 days. He was kept isolated from the world and was not even aware of the events that led to the resignation of Hadi and his prime minister Khaled Bahah. 

In an interview in Riyadh last month, he recalled the experience with a great amount of anger towards the Houthis, describing it as “worse than being killed.”

The Houthis have since tried to justify the abduction as a stand against the widely unpopular draft constitution drawn up by Bin Mubarak and Hadi. Among other things, it called for the division of Yemen into six regions, contrary to the Peace and National Partnership Agreement, which was agreed to by the Houthis last September.

When a committee about regional divisions was formed after the Conference of National Dialogue last year, Hadi presented its members with the draft of the division of regions, and gave them just one day to sign it.

This contributed to further tensions in the country—a small step in the series of events that would eventually push Yemen to the brink. Bin Mubarak has since denied any role in the regional division, stating that he “was only implementing what political leaders agreed on.”

But the Houthis’ problem with Bin Mubarak isn’t exclusive to the draft constitution or other outcomes of the National Dialogue Conference. Before that, last September, they vetoed his appointment as prime minister.

It is still not clear whether the Houthis took this stance due to a request from Iran or one from their ally, former president Saleh. Iran’s problem with Bin Mubarak isn’t solely related to his close relations with the West. More important to them is his past association with the Baath party in Iraq.

 Following his release by the Houthis, Bin Mubarak left Yemen for Saudi Arabia. One month later, he was joined by Hadi, who escaped from house arrest in Sanaa. Since Hadi’s arrival in Riyadh, Bin Mubarak has been helping to manage the president’s affairs, although he is not officially attached to the presidential office. After there lose of power in Yemen and fleeing to Saudi Arabia, the two men now use sponsored pages on Facebook attempting to reach to Yemenis.

There are also rumors—which Bin Mubarak denies—of tension between the new ambassador and the defence minister, Mahmoud Al Subayhi, who was captured by the Houthis several months ago and is still in their custody.

The appointment of Dr Bin Mubarak to a diplomatic post in Washington certainly puts an end to any political aspirations he may have had in Yemen.

And with fighting continuing in that country—including Houthi shelling in Aden that claimed at least 45 civilian lives on Sunday—the myth of Yemen’s “model transition” in the aftermath of the Arab Spring is well and truly dead.

This article was originally published by the National.

About the Author

Farea Al-Muslimi

Research fellow at Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Programme

Farea Al-Muslimi is a research fellow at Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Programme.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Master of the Middle

      Farea Al-Muslimi

  • Commentary
    A History of Missed Opportunities: Yemen and the GCC

      Farea Al-Muslimi

Farea Al-Muslimi
Research fellow at Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Programme
Farea Al-Muslimi
Political ReformGulfYemenMiddle East

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could the Rise of the New People Party Reshape Russia’s Managed Political System?

    Anger over online restrictions has led to a surge in support for the New People party, which has replaced the Communists as Russia’s second most popular political party.  

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    In Russia, the Public Mood Is Souring

    The Russian regime is now visibly motivated by fear.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Rada Reawakens: Ukraine’s Messy Politics Returns

    The return of parliamentary politics reflects a broader shift from earlier expectations of a settlement and elections toward the reality of a prolonged war.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

    The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?

    After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive. 

      Tatiana Stanovaya

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.