• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Sinan Ülgen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Turkey’s Transformation"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "Türkiye",
    "Middle East",
    "Western Europe",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "EU",
    "Migration",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

A Refugee Deal Hinges on Freedom of Travel for Turks

Ankara aims to exact additional commitments from Europe in the refugee deal. Above all, the Turkish government wants visa-free travel to Europe for its citizens.

Link Copied
By Sinan Ülgen
Published on Mar 17, 2016

Source: Financial Times

The European Council summit under way in Brussels has turned into a rescue operation. At stake is the survival of the refugee deal with Turkey. Last week, Ankara upended expectations by agreeing to take back from Europe migrants from countries such as Afghanistan and Morocco as well as Syrians stranded in the Greek islands.

The accord represented a political victory for Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, who from the outset had championed a European solution centred on a managed programme of refugee resettlement. At the same time the Turkish offer could eliminate the incentive to cross the Aegean — it would become an exercise in futility, with refugees being returned to Turkey.

Why is Turkey eager to accept this potentially large extra population of migrants and refugees? One reason is that it can cope. Unlike many countries in central and eastern Europe, where the appearance of a few hundred refugees from Syria was cause for political upheaval, Turkey has provided refuge to more than 2.5m Syrians fleeing the atrocities of civil war without any substantive domestic reaction.

Despite acrimonious local, national and presidential elections, the issue of refugees was never hijacked by the Turkish political class. For most Turks, a humanitarian embrace is the fitting response to such a large-scale tragedy affecting an Islamic population.

Turkey’s imperial legacy has led to a society that traces its roots to many corners of the lost empire, a significant factor underpinning popular and political tolerance.

But Ankara also aims to exact additional commitments from Europe. Turkey expects the EU to deliver more money for the refugees, a resettlement plan for the Syrians and a commitment to restart stalled accession talks. Above all, the Turkish government wants visa-free travel to Europe for its 78m citizens.

The abolition of Schengen visas would be a huge win for Turkey’s ruling elites. Removing the humiliating process of visa applications is certain to raise the popularity of the ruling Justice and Development party (AKP). Visa-free travel is the cornerstone of the deal, which will survive or die depending on whether the EU delivers.

This gathering of European leaders will be tasked with finalising the agreement with Turkey but the political backdrop does not augur well.

Most EU member states will find condoning visa-free travel for Turkey to be a difficult proposition. Governments in eastern Europe have shifted to an illiberal, anti-immigration discourse that will hinder their appetite for such a deal.

In the west, France appears the main stumbling block. François Hollande, the president, is keenly aware of his country’s political dynamics in the wake of the Paris attacks. In the popular mind, the issue of refugees has blended with terrorism, leading to a rise in support for the far-right National Front. The final potential obstacle is the European Parliament, which is critical of Turkey’s recent record on human rights, the rule of law and press freedom.

As the architect of the Turkey deal, Ms Merkel will have to cajole, pressure and possibly blackmail her counterparts to get their backing. Her strongest argument will be that the alternative to visa freedom for Turkey is far worse, in the form of an uncontrolled wave of migrants. She will also have to debunk the illusion of there being a third option: suspending free movement in Europe and building walls to protect its borders.

After overcoming the euro crisis, Europe finds itself once again at a decisive moment. This time its future will be determined not by its ability to impose fiscal discipline but rather whether it can find a common will to grant visa-free travel to Turkish citizens.

This article was originally published on the Financial Times.

About the Author

Sinan Ülgen

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Sinan Ülgen is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on Turkish foreign policy, transatlantic relations, international trade, economic security, and digital policy.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    Reforming European Security: A Turkish Perspective
      • +5

      Alper Coşkun, Fatih Ceylan, Tacan İldem, …

  • Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

      Sinan Ülgen

Sinan Ülgen
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Sinan Ülgen
EUMigrationForeign PolicyEuropeTürkiyeMiddle EastWestern EuropeIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?

    Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.

      Leonid Bershidsky

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the Kremlin

    Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.

      Konstantin Skorkin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Moldova’s Ruling Party PAS Must Graduate From Crisis Management to State Governance

    Whether PAS can refocus on the unfinished business of state-building may ultimately prove more consequential for Moldova’s European future than the pace of its accession negotiations.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s Weakness

    The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Iran War Fallout Gifts Putin Diplomatic Victory at ASEAN Summit

    Russia looks set to reap economic benefits from closer ties with Southeast Asian countries that are keen to find reliable energy suppliers and diversify trade ties.

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.