Commentary
Togzhan Kassenova
{
"authors": [
"Togzhan Kassenova"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
President Obama’s Visit to Hiroshima
What does President Obama’s visit to Hiroshima mean for his nuclear legacy?
Published on May 26, 2016
Source: CCTV America
Speaking on CCTV America on the eve of President Obama’s visit to Hiroshima, Carnegie’s Togzhan Kassenova discussed the significance of his trip. Kassenova explained that the trip served to remind of Obama’s personal commitment to a nuclear-free world, but also underscored the lack of progress with his nuclear agenda. Kassenova also commented on preserving the memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, noting that approximately 200,000 people continue to suffer adverse effects of the bombs.
About the Author
Togzhan Kassenova
Nonresident Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program
Kassenova is a nonresident fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment.
- How Kazakhstan Fought Back Against Soviet Nuclear Tests
- Perspectives on the Evolving Nuclear OrderReport
Toby Dalton, Togzhan Kassenova, Lauryn Williams
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- For Putin, Increasing Russia’s Nuclear Threat Matters More Than the Triad’s ModernizationCommentary
For Putin, upgrading Russia’s nuclear forces was a secondary goal. The main aim was to gain an advantage over the West, including by strengthening the nuclear threat on all fronts. That made growth in missile arsenals and a new arms race inevitable.
Maxim Starchak
- Japan’s “Militarist Turn” and What It Means for RussiaCommentary
For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.
James D.J. Brown
- Russia’s Latest Weapons Have Left Strategic Stability on the Brink of CollapseCommentary
The Kremlin will only be prepared to negotiate strategic arms limitations if it is confident it can secure significant concessions from the United States. Otherwise, meaningful dialogue is unlikely, and the international system of strategic stability will continue to teeter on the brink of total collapse.
Maxim Starchak
- How the Kremlin Lost TrumpCommentary
The collapse of the Budapest summit is an inevitable result of the Russian system of artificially creating foreign policy crises in order to achieve a desired outcome.
Alexander Baunov
- Japan’s New Prime Minister Looks Set to Hold the Line on RussiaCommentary
It is not just that Russia has started the largest war in Europe since 1945, it is also that Moscow signed a comprehensive strategic partnership agreement with North Korea that—from Tokyo’s perspective—makes Russia an accomplice to a regime that openly threatens Japan.
James D.J. Brown
