Article
Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier
REQUIRED IMAGE
Paper
Clinton Record on Democracy Promotion
Published on Sep 12, 2000
Source: Carnegie
Summary
For eight years, President Clinton and his aides have proclaimed democracy to be the organizing principle of US foreign policy, a principle representing the fusion of American ideals and interests. In this working paper, Thomas Carothers critically examines the actual role of democracy promotion in Clinton policies around the world. Carothers explores the frequent tensions, between democracy promotion and myriad other national interests-from the pursuit of trade to the combating of international drug trafficking- and, hence, the ultimately uneven record of the Clinton administration. Carothers analyzes the evolution of the Clinton administration's treatment of the issue over time, and gives attention to the role of Congress as well. Looking ahead to the role democracy promotion may play in the next administration, Carothers urges that democracy promotion not be cast aside as an outdated Clintonian custom and he sets out some practical recommendations for improving U.S. efforts.
Click on link above for full text of this Carnegie Paper.
About the Author
Thomas Carothers
Harvey V. Fineberg Chair for Democracy Studies; Director, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Thomas Carothers, director of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, is a leading expert on comparative democratization and international support for democracy.
- How Anger Over Corruption Keeps Driving Global Politics
- When Do Mass Protests Topple Autocrats?Commentary
Thomas Carothers, McKenzie Carrier
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- The Rada Reawakens: Ukraine’s Messy Politics ReturnsCommentary
The return of parliamentary politics reflects a broader shift from earlier expectations of a settlement and elections toward the reality of a prolonged war.
Balázs Jarábik
- Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?Commentary
The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.
Maria Kolomychenko
- Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?Commentary
After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?Commentary
Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle EastCommentary
The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
