But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
{
"authors": [
"Dmitri Trenin",
"Ryan Faith",
"Michal Baranowski",
"Christopher S. Chivvis"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [
"Eurasia in Transition"
],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Military",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
A Russian attack on NATO’s eastern member states was never likely. At the same time, the threat of escalation in eastern Ukraine and the potential for more direct Russian and NATO involvement in the fighting there is a clear and present danger.
Source: KCRW’s To the Point
After years of counterinsurgency in the Middle East, the Pentagon says the biggest threat to U.S. security is Russia. That’s not just because of Russia’s nuclear weapons, it’s “hybrid warfare” of the sort Vladimir Putin is using in eastern Ukraine. U.S. troops are already training to combine counterinsurgency with conventional weapons, street-level fighting, cyber warfare, and propaganda. One very concrete example of that changing strategy took place in the Mojave Desert earlier this month in an exercise called Operation Dragon Spear. The goal is deterring Russia from moving on NATO members Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania—or other members of the former Soviet Union.
Carnegie’s Dmitri Trenin talked to KCRW on this issue. Ryan Faith of the Vice News, Christopher Chivvis of the RAND Corporation, and Michal Baranowski of the German Marshall Fund were also featured, along with host Warren Olney.
Trenin’s key point was that Russia’s attitude toward Ukraine differs fundamentally from its view of the Baltic states and Poland: Ukraine is part of what Putin calls “the Russian world,” while the latter are seen as parts of the Soviet empire that are “lost forever.” There is no reason, therefore, to believe Putin will do to other countries what he has done in Ukraine.
Asked whether NATO’s attempt to shore up its eastern flank would be an effective deterrent toward Russia, Trenin suggested the question missed the mark, because a Russian attack on NATO’s eastern member states was never likely. While acknowledging that history had given eastern Europe reason to fear Russia, Trenin argued that it would be wiser to focus on the threat of escalation in eastern Ukraine—the potential for more direct Russian and NATO involvement in the fighting in Donbas is “a clear and present danger.”
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
Ryan Faith
Michal Baranowski
Senior Fellow and Director, American Statecraft Program
Christopher S. Chivvis is the director of the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.
Elina Noor