{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 11, 2006
CONTACT: Jennifer Linker, jlinker@carnegieendowment.org, 202/365-1490
In a new Policy Outlook, Nickel and Diming the Poor: U.S. Implementation of the LDC Initiative, Carnegie Associate Viji Rangaswami argues that the U.S. should provide open access for least developed country (LDC) exports, which would yield real benefits to the global poor and allow the U.S. to reclaim its leadership position in the struggling WTO Doha round. Rangaswami outlines the issues and interests at stake and offers a proposal to provide the poorest countries open access while addressing U.S. policymakers’ concerns. Click here to read.
The Doha Round promised to focus on development and had explicit commitments to promote the development interests of least developed or poorest countries. Any realistic outcome of the round, however, will only produce marginal gains—in some cases losses—for the poorest countries. Rangaswami argues that such a result is not only unacceptable but also avoidable. At the December 2005 WTO meeting, wealthy countries agreed to open their markets to poor country exports by eliminating tariffs and quotas, a move that would dramatically alter the outcome of the round for the global poor by producing tangible gains for countries like Bangladesh, Cambodia, Malawi and Tanzania.
The current U.S. position on access for the poorest countries jeopardizes these potential gains says Rangaswami. The United States sought the right to exclude up to three percent of poor country exports from the open access commitment in order to shield its textile and sugar producers.
Rangaswami urges U.S. policymakers to reconsider their position. She offers four recommendations on how the United States should open its market to the poor. She also analyzes the prospects for action by the U.S. Congress, and argues that broad based congressional support can be found. Rangaswami emphasizes that it is time for U.S. policymakers to work across aisles to defeat narrow interests seeking to exclude the products of greatest importance to the poorest countries.
Direct link to pdf: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/Rangaswami_formatted.pdf
Viji Rangaswami is an associate in the Trade, Equity, and Development Project at the Carnegie Endowment. She was formerly minority trade counsel to the Committee on the Ways and Means in the U.S. House of Representatives. Her work focuses on how multilateral and regional trade agreements, as well as unilateral preference programs, can promote development particularly among the least developed countries.
www.CarnegieEndowment.org/trade
Press Contact:
Jennifer Linker, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org, +1 202/939-2372
###
Europe’s industrial supply chains leave it vulnerable to global shocks. The EU needs a pragmatic green industrial strategy that balances durable partnerships and bolsters homegrown clean tech without sacrificing low-carbon ambition.
Milo McBride, Pauline Gerard
As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.
Sinan Ülgen
The EU is putting together a new security strategy to meet today’s myriad challenges. But for any proposal to be effective, the union needs to grapple with its identity and ambitions.
Pierre Vimont
Between the United States’ market-driven approach and China's state-led industrial strategy, Europe is reckoning with how it can remain competitive in the global economy. But is Europe in danger of becoming a U.S. or China colony?
Noah Barkin, Anu Bradford
Following Ursula von der Leyen’s gaffe equating Turkey to Russia and China, relations with Ankara risk deteriorating even further. Without better, more consistent diplomatic messaging, how can the EU pretend to be a geopolitical power?
Sinan Ülgen