• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "scholarSpotlight",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Scholar Spotlight

Executive Summary: Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific

As China and India develop strategic interests beyond their territorial and regional waters, their naval footprints will grow, overlap, and generate the basis for potential conflict.

Link Copied
Published on Oct 24, 2012

As China and India globalize their economies and develop strategic interests beyond their territorial and regional waters, their naval footprints will grow, overlap, and generate the basis for potential conflict. While neither country is ready to supplant the United States as the dominant naval power in the Indo-Pacific, their growing rivalry promises to deepen security dilemmas in the region and alter the world’s maritime space.

Key Themes

  • The Chinese and Indian navies are transforming themselves from coastal defense forces into instruments of power projection.
  • China’s principal maritime preoccupations remain the western Pacific—reunifying Taiwan, defending Chinese territorial claims, and constraining the naval dominance of the United States. However, Beijing is beginning to push into the Indian Ocean to ensure access to overseas energy sources.
  • New Delhi is now starting to make regular naval forays into the Pacific Ocean, having proclaimed for decades that its strategic interests stretched only from Aden to Malacca, the two choke points to the Indian Ocean.
  • China seeks long-term access arrangements in the Indian Ocean and India is consolidating long-standing economic and security cooperation with Mauritius, Seychelles, Maldives, and Sri Lanka.
  • In the Arabian Sea, rivalry between China and India is muted by America’s overwhelming political and naval presence.
  • The Chinese and Indian navies are starting to explore bilateral confidence-building measures, including ship visits, port calls, joint exercises, and high-level naval exchanges.

Recommendations for Chinese and Indian Policymakers

  • Negotiate an ‘incidents at sea’ agreement. Borrowing from a successful pact between the American and Soviet navies, China and India should exchange information on encounters between their two navies and establish a joint committee to annually review incidents.
  • Pursue a maritime security dialogue. A substantive and open-ended dialogue between China and India on maritime and naval issues is imperative to reduce the potential for miscommunication and conflict.
  • Secure the commons. China and India should initiate a trilateral dialogue with the United States on potential cooperation in securing the maritime commons in the Indo-Pacific.




ABOUT THE AUTHOR: C. Raja Mohan heads the strategic studies program at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi. He is a columnist on foreign affairs for one of India’s leading English dailies, Indian Express. Mohan is also a nonresident senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

SecurityMilitaryForeign PolicySouth AsiaIndiaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Von der Leyen Antonio Costa EU Europe
    Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe’s Self-Confidence Problem

    The EU’s responses to two recent incidents expose the gulf between European perceptions and capabilities. Unless the union can bridge that gap, it will never become a real geostrategic power.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Pituffik base greenland US Denmark
    Article
    Europe’s Overseas Countries and Territories as Geopolitical Assets

    European states control several Overseas Countries and Territories around the world that carry strategic, economic, and environmental weight. As great powers challenge the rules-based order, defending them is a geopolitical imperative for Europe.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Letter from the Editor: Europe Takes Two Steps Forward But One Step Back

    As we close out another season of Strategic Europe, it is worth taking stock of the deep shifts underway.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Paper
    Assessing Information Ecosystems: How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats

    The hybrid warfare landscape is evolving rapidly, leaving policymakers without clear strategies. To better inform their work in addressing emerging challenges, governments must dig deeper into the underlying dynamics at play.

      Raluca Csernatoni, Alicia Wanless

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Are the EU’s Watered-Down Russia Sanctions Better than None?

    The EU had to compromise to adopt a twenty-first sanctions package against Russia, exposing growing cracks in the union’s resolve. Is this latest, weaker round worth it to keep pressure on Moscow?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.