Ariel (Eli) Levite, Toby Dalton
{
"authors": [
"Ariel (Eli) Levite"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Israel"
],
"topics": []
}Source: Getty
A View From Israel
Three bright spots amid national trauma.
These are somber times in Israel. The small nation is licking its wounds, weeping, and burying well over a thousand citizens (mostly civilians) massacred in the violence unleashed by Hamas, while attending to thousands of casualties incurred. It is simultaneously trying to take care of many thousands of bereaved or displaced families while soothing the raw nerves of much of its population still living under the incessant threat of further Hamas rocket attacks and border infiltrations. In parallel, it is fully mobilizing its military to strike back at Hamas and dissuade saber-rattling Hezbollah from taking advantage of the situation.
The national trauma stems from the realization that Israel’s formidable military and intelligence failed to protect its population from a second-rate nonstate military organization, and from witnessing the unprecedented level of savagery exercised by Hamas against peaceful settlers—including hundreds of elderly, women, and children. It is exacerbated by watching with acute anxiety how Hamas handles the hundred-plus civilians taken hostage, as well as from the rude awakening in the Israeli government’s misguided, long-standing strategy to stave off Hamas’ aggression by buying it off using Qatari money, Israeli electricity supply, exports and transfers of goods, and even work permits in Israel for some Gazans.
Three bright spots have nonetheless emerged. First, Israelis have displayed a stunning level of national solidarity, cohesion, and mutual support, notwithstanding the bitter domestic political rivalries that preceded the war. Second, the Israeli Defense Forces have demonstrated a capacity to regroup and move to defend the nation and go on the offensive, despite the large and traumatic losses they experienced. Third, and by no means least, Israel has received an outpouring of moral, political, and military support to Israel in its moment of distress, led by the United States and personally by President Joe Biden.
The days and weeks to come will remain challenging for Israel and its neighbors, allies, and the world writ large. Can Israel’s military campaign eliminate the attack’s perpetrators and dismantle their offensive infrastructure while sparing innocent civilians in Gaza? Will this conflict spill over, provoking escalation inside and around Israel (especially in the West Bank and with Hezbollah)? Can an alternative regime be established in the Gaza Strip—one that will prioritize reconstruction and looking after its impoverished population over fighting Israel? And can the wounds of this unprecedented trauma paradoxically serve as a catalyst not only for a national healing process within Israel but also for normalization with additional Arab neighbors, including the Palestinians?
About the Author
Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program, Technology and International Affairs Program
Levite was the principal deputy director general for policy at the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission from 2002 to 2007.
- Promoting Responsible Nuclear Energy Conduct: An Agenda for International CooperationArticle
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Europe on Iran: Gone with the WindCommentary
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont
- How EU Foreign Policy Turned RegionalPaper
The EU’s engagement with the rest of the world has become increasingly uneven. To chase the ambition of a global Europe, the second von der Leyen commission must leverage funds and diplomatic tools to play a more cohesive role in shaping international affairs.
Francesco Siccardi
- Taking the Pulse: Should the EU Seek a Seat on Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace?Commentary
Despite holding significant leverage, the EU remains sidelined in ongoing diplomacy around the Gaza peace plan. How can the union overcome internal divisions to take a more active role?
Rym Momtaz
- Erdoğan and Trump: Affinity over DiscordCommentary
Erdoğan and Trump’s meeting served both leaders’ domestic and personal agendas. For Europe, it highlights how America’s transactional approach risks sidelining allies and empowering authoritarians.
Marc Pierini
- The Trump Gaza Peace Plan Needs the EU, TooCommentary
The EU can play an essential role in ensuring all phases of U.S. President Donald Trump’s peace plan are implemented by both Israel and the Palestinians. But for the union to exert its influence, Germany must rethink its unwavering support for Israel.
Rym Momtaz