• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUNATO
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Marc Pierini"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Southern, Eastern, and Western Africa"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "EU"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Honoring the Bulgarian Medics Freed from Libya in 2007

Libya would win the praise of the international community if it offered both apology and compensation to the six formerly imprisoned Bulgarian medics charged with conspiring to infect children with HIV.

Link Copied
By Marc Pierini
Published on Jul 24, 2012
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

Five years ago today, five Bulgarian nurses and a Bulgarian-Palestinian doctor were repatriated, free, from Tripoli to Sofia. It was a day of relief, after thirty-three months of strenuous negotiations, three successive death sentences pronounced after fake trials, the scars of torture, many promises of liberation, and several failed attempts.

Five years is a long time in politics and Libya has certainly evolved a great deal since 2007. But in light of Libya’s new realities, this anniversary takes on a new significance.

Why? Because one person was in power then and still is now: Mustafa Abdul Jalil, who today heads the National Transitional Council of Libya and is, for all intents and purposes, today's Libyan Head of State, was the Libyan Minister of Justice back in 2007. In his previous position, he was the official who prevented at several times the liberation of the medics.

Let's remind ourselves of the key elements of the "Benghazi Case", as it was called, which ended up in dignity for all parties. Or, better said, in dignity except for one point:

  • The six medics were released with no conditions;
     
  • The 450 families of the children infected with HIV/ AIDS in Benghazi were compensated with one million dollars each, paid by the Benghazi International Fund, itself funded by the Libyan Economic and Social Fund, without any "ransom" or "compensation" paid by the European Union or any other government;
     
  • The children of Benghazi were offered first class, long-term treatment under the "Benghazi Action Plan", a medical cooperation scheme funded by the EU with some 12 million euro. This scheme stopped the progression of the disease and restored hope for the families. It also set standards for the (previously unexisting) Libyan HIV policy.

Without going into the many intricacies of the negotiation (of which I happened to be the permanent member on the EU side), let me just say that one issue, one only, was left out of the final settlement: the moral and physical suffering of the six medics. At no point during this long negotiation was it possible for me and the other negotiators to entertain with the Gaddafi regime the issue of compensation for the medics. And indeed the absolute priority was their release.

In today’s context, there is a political meaning to this fifth anniversary: the way in which the new, democratic Libya will face its past will shape her image and her democratic credentials one way or the other.

My point here is a simple one: in order to close the Benghazi Case in dignity and completely, would it not be appropriate for today's Libya to erase this dark episode of its recent past and to apologize and compensate the six medics in the same way and amount the Benghazi families were compensated?

The case has amply demonstrated that the medics were for strictly nothing in the Benghazi infection. Yet, they stayed in prison for eight and a half years, were tortured many times, were condemned to death three times, and suffered an endless parody of justice. All of this has been well documented. For sure, they are free, but they never got one word of apology or any amount of compensation in the name of Libya or from any other source.

Today's Libya is back on the international stage, she has recovered huge frozen assets and relaunched oil and gas production, she is holding elections in dignity, and she is struggling to rebuild herself as an organized society. This Libya has the support of the international community.

This new Libya would win the praise of the international community if she also "officially" erased one of the darkest wrongdoings of the former regime and offered both apology and compensation to the six Bulgarian medics.

And the gesture would be all the more representative of the new Libya if it was decided and offered by Mustafa Abdul Jalil himself. Today is the day to think about this.

Marc Pierini, a former EU career diplomat, has served as the EU Ambassador to Turkey, Tunisia, Libya, Syria, and Morocco.

About the Author

Marc Pierini

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Marc Pierini is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, where his research focuses on developments in the Middle East and Turkey from a European perspective.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good Reasons

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    The Iran War’s Dangerous Fallout for Europe

      Marc Pierini

Marc Pierini
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Marc Pierini
EUSouthern, Eastern, and Western Africa

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europeans Are Quiet Quitting the United States

    European leaders have now not only lost faith in Donald Trump’s U.S. presidency, but also in America’s hegemony as a whole. But short-term challenges make an immediate divorce unwise.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

    Europe has an interest in supporting Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan as he tries to make peace with neighbors and loosen ties with Russia. But it is depersonalized support in the long term, not quickfire flash, that will win the day.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Equivocating on Turkey Is Bad Geopolitics

    Following Ursula von der Leyen’s gaffe equating Turkey to Russia and China, relations with Ankara risk deteriorating even further. Without better, more consistent diplomatic messaging, how can the EU pretend to be a geopolitical power?

      Sinan Ülgen

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is the EU Ready for Rapprochement With the UK?

    Closer EU-UK ties could help address urgent European concerns. But is the EU ready for rapprochement with the United Kingdom?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    France, Italy, and Spain Should Use Force in Lebanon

    Europe has been standing by while its Southern neighborhood is being redrawn by force. To establish a path to peace between Israel and Lebanon, it’s time for Europeans to get involved with hard power.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.