{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"EU"
]
}
Source: Getty
The special relationship between Europe and the United States has come under strain in recent years,and has exposed deep cultural differences between both sides.
Now that Barack Obama will remain in the White House for another four years, there are hopes that the transatlantic relationship will be revived.
Besides security, the special relationship between Europe and the United States has been based on shared values of democracy, the state of law, and the free market.
That relationship has come under strain in recent years, not just because the Cold War is over. The war in Iraq, the Guantanamo Bay detention center, and the euro crisis, have exposed deep cultural differences between both sides. Here they are, a list from a European perspective that is certainly incomplete and also presented in no particular order.
Most Americans support the death penalty. On November 6, in California, Proposition 34, an initiative to replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without parole, was narrowly defeated by a vote of 53% to 47%.
They believe torture is acceptable in war.
They believe in projection of military force first, and soft power second.
They oppose gun control.
They are intrinsically optimistic.
They are stoical. Look at how they pick themselves up after natural catastrophes.
They believe in opportunity. Aspiring immigrants dream of obtaining a Green Card in order to work and settle in the United States.
They believe individuals hold the key to success and happiness. They scorn Europe’s reliance on the nanny state.
They take religion seriously and abortion remains a big issue.
They are extraordinarily philanthropic and generous. Look how universities, hospitals, research centers, museums, and foundations are funded.
They invest in innovation.
They take risks.
They invest in talent.
They are mobile.
Unions are distrusted.
The cost of medical care is prohibitive, yet compulsory medical insurance is controversial, as Obama knows all too well.
Vacations are short, and maternity leave is minimal.
Climate change is not a big issue.
Despite all of those differences, Americans are culturally and politically still our closest allies in the world. And it’s not a bad thing, either, if our outlook on life gets challenged every so often.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.
Rym Momtaz
A prophetic Romanian novel about a town at the mouth of the Danube carries a warning: Europe decays when it stops looking outward. In a world of increasing insularity, the EU should heed its warning.
Thomas de Waal
The EU lacks leadership and strategic planning in the South Caucasus, while the United States is leading the charge. To secure its geopolitical interests, Brussels must invest in new connectivity for the region.
Zaur Shiriyev
In return for a trade deal and the release of political prisoners, the United States has lifted sanctions on Belarus, breaking the previous Western policy consensus. Should Europeans follow suit, using their leverage to extract concessions from Lukashenko, or continue to isolate a key Kremlin ally?
Thomas de Waal, ed.