• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUDemocracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change",
    "EU"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Germany’s Election Campaign: Tax and Spend

As Merkel defends austerity and the opposition pledges higher taxes and spending, Germany’s next election will have a huge impact on the future of Europe and the euro.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Apr 29, 2013
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

When German Chancellor Angela Merkel was elected for a second term in 2009, her junior coalition partners, the Free Democrats, had one main economic policy: lower taxes.

You would think this would be popular with most Germans. After all, such measures would leave more money in people’s pockets, boosting consumer spending and increasing imports. This, in turn, would create more jobs and help Europe’s economy.

Yet every tax proposal the Free Democrats made was criticized for supposedly favoring the rich. The party helped that impression, too. When it pushed through a lower rate of value-added tax for hotels, it was immediately accused of bowing to a particular lobby.

Now, with only five months to go before Germany’s next federal election, taxes and spending have jumped to the top of the campaign agenda.

This issue has put Merkel in a tight spot. While she is still defending her austerity plans for debt-ridden eurozone countries, Germany’s opposition parties are pledging to tax more and spend more if elected this September.

Such a change of policy could have a domino effect throughout Europe. After all, it was Germany that was at the forefront of calls for less, not more, spending.

So why does the opposition see higher taxes and higher spending as a winning strategy?

The reason is the German public’s growing concern over matters of social justice—an issue that is going to be hard for Merkel to avoid.

Economic studies show that, over the past ten years, incomes have become far more unequal in Germany. This has hit a raw nerve with many Germans, who believe that the growing gap between rich and poor will undermine the social solidarity system that was established after World War II.

There is also a widely shared populist sentiment directed against bankers who continue to receive big salaries. At the same time, since the beginning of the financial crisis in 2008, the taxpayer has had to spend untold billions to rescue troubled banks.

The opposition Social Democrats, as well as the Greens and the more radical Left Party, have made social justice the core of their election campaigns. They are determined to raise taxes for the wealthy, introduce a wealth tax, restrict executive pay, and extend the inheritance tax.

Peer Steinbrück, the Social Democratic candidate who is running for chancellor against Merkel and who served in her first government as finance minister, also intends to introduce a minimum wage of €8.50 ($11) per hour, increase social security spending, and give low-income workers far more support.

According to research by Deutsche Bank, about 25 percent of all employed people earn wages that are one-third below average. In 2000, that share was 20 percent.

The opposition Greens are calling for even steeper tax hikes than the Social Democrats. At their party congress in Berlin last weekend, one of the few dissenting voices was Winfried Kretschmann, the Green premier of the southern state of Baden-Württemberg. As governor of that hothouse of German industry, Kretschmann knows all too well how higher taxes would affect Germany’s small and medium-sized companies, known as the Mittelstand.

Chancellor Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union has yet to present its own election program, but the party has made it clear that it is set against tax increases. Merkel has also defended the social reforms that her predecessor Gerhard Schröder began ten years ago. Ironically, Schröder was a Social Democrat, just as Steinbrück, who now wants to disown many of those reforms.

“I see Germany as a country that shows how effective reforms can be,” Merkel said last week in an interview with the mass-circulation newspaper Bild. “Many in Europe will remember that, just ten years ago, Germany was described as the ‘sick man of Europe.’ ”

Then, as if in a warning shot to the opposition, she said “there is no such thing as on-tap wealth, and the public needs to understand that.”

Merkel is still very popular domestically, but in Europe her calls for austerity are met with increasing skepticism. In the eurozone’s crisis countries, but also in Paris and Brussels, there are many who will hope for a change of government in Berlin.

The battle lines are drawn for an election that will have an enormous impact on the future course of Europe and the euro.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Climate ChangeEUEurope

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Europe Must Take Charge of its Russia Diplomacy Now

    Trump is distracted and Ukraine wants Europe to step up. The continent’s leaders must find their voice and assert it in talks with Russia.

      Alissa de Carbonnel

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against Europe

    Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?

    Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Sycophancy Worked on Trump

    Nearly a year and a half after Europeans leaned into sucking up to Trump, the strategy has produced some benefits when it comes to Ukraine.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Le Pen Verdict: How French Politics Turned MAGA

    Far-right leader Marine Le Pen can—and will—run in France’s next presidential election. What does the outcome of her appeal against a 2025 embezzlement conviction mean for the country’s political future?

      Catherine Fieschi

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.