First, the ultimate goal of the CFSP and CSDP is not to bring about more integration. Their ultimate goal is to make and keep the continent free, safe, and prosperous.

When I was asked to testify before the European Parliament’s Security and Defense Subcommittee a few weeks ago, I discovered how Euroskeptics such as the British Conservative Member of the European Parliament Geoffrey Van Orden twist and spin every argument just to portray the entire debate about European foreign and security policy as a big plot to bring about political integration.

I wasn’t angry so much about this silly and very predictable adage as about the obvious lack of interest Van Orden showed in the actual arguments and issues. The sole purpose of his presence at the parliament’s hearing was to undermine the debate and to provoke a slanging match that would produce the kind of juicy soundbite he could then take back home to reinforce his reputation as an upright warrior against “Brussels madness.”

Thankfully, there were quite a few other parliamentarians present that day who showed a stronger work ethic and engaged in a serious and substantive discussion.

The bottom line is that Europe’s desired end state—freedom, peace, prosperity—is more important than the process by which it gets there. I am agnostic as to whether achieving that goal will require more or less EU integration. Whatever works is good for me.

But I am absolutely sure that if Europeans are to think more strategically about their role in the world and about ensuring a bright future for the continent in a rapidly changing world, then relying on NATO and the United States alone would be foolish.

Europeans should use all available channels to bring about that culture shift, and that clearly includes the EU. That does not mean that more European integration is imminent. Quite on the contrary, in fact. There are no clear signs of significant steps in that direction anytime soon.

The second point to keep in mind when assessing the role of EU foreign policy is that treating the CFSP and CSDP as low-priority elements in the debate about the future of Europe is counterproductive. While it may currently be fashionable to do so, that would not only be detrimental to European interests around the world, but it might actually hasten the breakup of the EU as a whole. That is because, for more and more member states, the EU is becoming a useful and promising vehicle to promote their foreign and security interests.

These member states can be divided into three groups. First are the smaller countries whose only way to be influential is through Brussels. Second are the states who have lost confidence that NATO and the United States still stand firm to protect them if needed; these include many Central European nations, most notably Poland. Third are those for whom the EU can be the occasional means for fulfilling some grand geopolitical aspiration that lies outside their individual capacity; these include a teeth-clenching UK.

For many countries, EU foreign policy is their last remaining expectation of Brussels after the huge disappointments the bloc has caused in other areas. In particular, this group includes the United States, which thinks little of the EU’s internal workings but has learned to appreciate, fear, and respect its powerful role in international trade, and therefore in international sanctions regimes.

One thing is clear: foreign policy is unlikely to be “the next big thing” in EU integration. It does not have the horsepower to drive the entire apparatus forward or to restore Europe’s old intrinsic magic that seems to have faded away. But without a stronger common foreign policy, the EU will lose the allure of membership and the interest of its global partners.

The CFSP and CSDP are not the logical, unavoidable next steps toward further EU integration. But without them integration might become even shallower than it is at the moment.