• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Democracy",
    "EU"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Is This Ukraine’s Turning Point?

Recent protests in the Ukrainian capital are the biggest since the Orange Revolution of 2004. There are signs that this time around, things might turn out differently.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Dec 9, 2013
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

The demonstrations in Ukraine’s capital on December 7–8 were huge. Hundreds of thousands of people gathered in Kiev’s Independence Square for the third consecutive weekend of major protests.

This is not the first time Kiev has seen such a wave of demonstrations. Nine years ago, the Orange Revolution raised a hope of genuine change. But as the country’s leadership descended into infighting and corruption, prodemocracy Ukrainians and their European and American sympathizers were left short. The real revolution never happened, also because of Ukraine’s close ties to Russia and the ambiguous role of its wealthy oligarchs.

Ukraine now has another chance because of a series of recent changes there and in the EU.

First, over the past few days, Ukrainian protesters have shifted their focus. Originally, it was Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s refusal to sign a new association agreement with the EU that set off the protests in Kiev.

The promise of closer trade, political, and social ties with the EU had a psychological and symbolic importance for many Ukrainians, even though the accord made no mention of Ukraine ever joining the EU. The fact that Yanukovych gave in to Russia, which had exerted intense pressure primarily through trade embargoes, was a big blow to many Ukrainians, particularly the younger generation.

Now, however, the demonstrators are protesting against the endemic corruption that has bedeviled Ukraine ever since it declared its independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991. This is important.

Yes, moving closer to Europe continues to matter—just look at the EU flags fluttering alongside Ukrainian flags on Independence Square. But Ukrainians are now focusing on the malfunctioning of their own society: the neglected infrastructure and the bribery, the absence of transparency in the government, and the huge political influence of the oligarchs.

A second factor that has changed is Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel has been very supportive of the protests. In Kiev last week, Guido Westerwelle, Germany’s outgoing foreign minister, stood alongside Vitali Klitschko, the heavyweight boxer who has become the leader of Ukraine’s opposition. The crowds applauded.

Westerwelle’s presence was a signal to Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, that this time around, Germany was not going to remain silent and allow Russia to dictate Ukraine’s political and economic direction.

What a contrast to the Orange Revolution, when former chancellor Gerhard Schröder, a close friend of Putin’s, distanced himself from what was happening in Ukraine.

Merkel, who, in contrast to Schröder, has repeatedly criticized Putin for human rights violations, has taken an unusually strong stance on Ukraine. During a speech in the German Bundestag just days before last month’s Eastern Partnership summit in Vilnius, she said that Ukraine must choose its own political orientation. Russia, she insisted, had no veto.

To confirm Berlin’s shift, the Chancellery intends to invite Klitschko to the European People’s Party, a gathering of European conservative political parties, which will meet in Brussels later this month. In another snub to Putin, Germany’s President Joachim Gauck announced that he would not be attending the opening ceremony of the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi.

The third change has to do with a statue of Lenin. During the early 1990s, giant Soviet-era statues of Lenin were pulled down in most Eastern and Central European capitals. That destruction symbolized the break with Moscow. On Sunday, Kiev finally had its turn. A group of protesters toppled the statue that had for decades stood at the top of Shevchenko Boulevard, not far from Independence Square.

The fourth change is that Catherine Ashton, the EU’s top diplomat, will travel to Kiev to try to mediate between the government and protesters. Ashton has substantial credibility after leading international negotiations with Iran on its nuclear program and her success in brokering a deal between Serbia and Kosovo.

But time is short. The EU cannot risk Ukraine slipping into violence or anarchy. The price would be extremely high—not least because of how Russia might react.

With all of these factors of change, Ukraine is going through immense upheaval. Putin is desperate to hold on to the country, knowing full well that if Ukraine goes over to the EU, Russia’s own bulwarks against the EU’s creeping democratic influences will crumble.

Of course, that is exactly what the EU—especially Poland and the Baltic states—wants. Those countries would like Ukraine to be integrated into the EU to act as a buffer against Russia. They also want a democratic Ukraine because it would be a more predictable neighbor.

After three weeks of protests, it is clear that Ukraine’s present, dysfunctional system is neither sustainable nor stable. Ashton and Merkel realize what is at stake. Ukrainians deserve to have their second revolution succeed.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
DemocracyEUEastern EuropeUkraineRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less

    Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.

      Dimitar Bechev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can European Defense Survive the Death of FCAS?

    France and Germany’s failure to agree on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) raises questions about European defense. Amid industrial rivalries and competing strategic cultures, what does the future of European military industrial projects look like?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.