• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Russia",
    "Ukraine"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Democracy",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Russia Is (Again) Persecuting the Crimean Tatars

Since the West acquiesced over Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea, Moscow has a free hand to pressurize and intimidate the peninsula’s Tatars.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Sep 25, 2014
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

Earlier this year, in Poland’s Royal Castle, a diminutive man dressed in a suit that hung loosely over his frail frame was called to take the floor. Mustafa Dzhemilev, the leader of the Crimean Tatars, was being awarded the first-ever international Lech Wałęsa Solidarity Prize at an event that coincided with the twenty-fifth anniversary of Poland’s freedom from Communism.

Radek Sikorski had established the prize. As Poland’s foreign minister, Sikorski has made human rights and the struggle for freedom the hallmarks of his term in office. But more importantly, he used Poland’s peaceful transition to democracy as a means to help other countries in Eastern Europe do the same.

For Dzhemilev, the prospect that Crimea could make that transition has been destroyed, for the moment, by Russia. In March 2014, Russia marched into Crimea and illegally annexed the peninsula, which had previously been part of Ukraine. Since then, the Crimean Tatars, a Turkic ethnic group native to the peninsula, have been subject to intimidation, arrests, and expulsions. Such persecution is a symptom of a new wave of Russian nationalism that, if unchecked, could threaten other minorities.

It is estimated that 3,000 Tatars have already left Crimea this year, out of fear. It’s not the first time that the population, which first settled in Crimea during the fifteenth century, has had to endure such pressure. In May 1944, Stalin deported some 190,000 Tatars to Central Asia, allegedly for their collaboration with the Nazis. Soon after Stalin’s death in 1953, a Crimean Tatar movement was established with the aim of returning Tatars to their homeland.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, tens of thousands of Tatars did return to Crimea. According to Ukraine’s 2001 national census, Crimea was home to 243,000 Tatars out of a population of around 2 million.

Dzhemilev knows all about exile. In 1944, his family was deported to Uzbekistan. In 1966, he was arrested and sent to a labor camp after refusing to sign up to the Soviet Army. Over the next two decades, he spent almost fifteen years in camps and exile, in part because of his work in co-founding the Initiative Group for the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR, which petitioned the UN on behalf of victims of Soviet repression.

In 1989, Dzhemilev and his family were allowed to return to Crimea. Two years later, he was elected the first chairman of the Mejlis, the organization representing the Crimean Tatars.

When in March 2014 Russia called a snap referendum on the status of Crimea, Dzhemilev and many other Tatars opposed the vote. They wanted the peninsula to remain part of Ukraine. As a result, the Russian authorities installed in Crimea after the annexation declared Dzhemilev and other leading Crimean Tatars personae non gratae. He has been banned from entering Crimea until 2019. Rafat Chubarov, who succeeded Dzhemilev as head of the Mejlis, is living in exile in Kiev.

Over recent months, swastikas have been daubed on some Tatar houses, reflecting how Russian propaganda demonizes those who oppose the Kremlin’s policies as Nazis or fascists. Other houses have been marked indicating that their inhabitants are Tatars. Anybody caught speaking the group’s Turkic language also risks persecution.

Tatars who refuse to take up Russian citizenship in Crimea can retain their Ukrainian citizenship, but they will be deemed foreigners. In short, the Crimean Tatars have come under sustained pressure to toe the line or be expelled.

Such intimidation has increased since September 14, when Crimea held its first local government elections since the annexation. For the most part, the Tatars boycotted these elections.

On September 16, Russian security service agents and police raided the Mejlis and confiscated documents, computers, and books. Sergey Aksyonov, Crimea’s pro-Russian prime minister, said the authorities had received “signals about banned literature.” The Crimean Tatars were given twelve hours to clear the building or face eviction by force.

Aksyonov told the Russian daily newspaper Kommersant that the Mejlis did not exist. “From a juridical perspective, there is no such organization for me. What Mejlis? The organization was not registered properly. It does not exist.”

The Crimea Fund charity, which works for the Tatar community and owns the Mejlis building and other properties, was banned from leasing or selling its properties. In addition, businesses, schools, and mosques have been raided.

It’s hard to see how the Crimean Tatars can resist such pressure. “Crimea has become forgotten,” said Johanna Green, program manager at Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, an advocacy movement. If the Russian authorities continue to persecute the Crimean Tatars, that could bode ill for other minorities in Russia proper, who must sense how a growing wave of Russian nationalism threatens their identity.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
DemocracyCivil SocietyEastern EuropeRussiaUkraine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Win or Lose, Orbán has Broken Hungary’s Democracy

    Hungarians head to the polls on April 12 for an election of national and European consequence. Three different outcomes are on the cards, each with their own implications for the EU.

      Zsuzsanna Szelényi

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Is France Shifting Rightward?

    The far right failed to win big in France’s municipal elections. But that’s not good news for the country’s left wing, which remained disunited while the broader right consolidated its momentum ahead of the 2027 presidential race.

      Catherine Fieschi

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.