• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Anthony Manduca"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "EU"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Letter From Valletta

Malta’s small size prevents it from coming up with major foreign policy initiatives, but it is nevertheless keen to promote peace and stability in the Mediterranean.

Link Copied
By Anthony Manduca
Published on Feb 20, 2015
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

Strategic Europe continues its series devoted to explaining the foreign and security policy ambitions of the 28 EU member states. We have asked our contributors from each capital to give a candid assessment of their country’s perception of security and strategy, with a ranking on a scale from 0 (the laggards) to 5 (the ambitious). This week, the spotlight is on Malta.

*

Malta tends to be a consensus seeker, not a leader, when it comes to European foreign policy. The country’s small size prevents it from coming up with major foreign policy initiatives within the European Union, but Valletta is nevertheless very keen on promoting peace and stability in the Mediterranean as well as dialogue and cooperation between the EU and the Arab world.

Given this combination of its small size and high level of enthusiasm, I would rank Malta’s foreign policy ambition 2.5 out of 5.

Malta’s location in the middle of the Mediterranean makes it an ideal interlocutor between the EU and its Southern neighbors. For example, Malta has focused a great deal on trying to bring about an end to the crisis in Libya. On a number of occasions, EU foreign ministers have discussed the situation in Libya at Malta’s insistence. The Maltese government’s main priority is to prevent its North African neighbor from becoming a failed state and a haven for Islamic jihadists.

Maltese Foreign Minister George Vella has often stressed that a political solution to the crisis in Libya is the only plausible option for a return to normality, and he has refused to take sides in Libya’s civil war. While recognizing the government that is based in Libya’s eastern city of Tobruk, Malta has kept open a dialogue with the parallel government in Tripoli run by the militias from Misrata. Valletta has urged the two sides to enter into talks aimed at ending the war.

Malta is a very strong supporter of a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The Maltese foreign ministry lists as one of its strategic objectives the need to “maintain a special focus on furthering dialogue, peace, stability and prosperity in the Mediterranean and the Middle East.” Malta has continually urged the EU to play a more active role in the Middle East peace process and has not held back from criticizing the illegal Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Malta is also one of the few EU member states to officially recognize Palestine as an independent state.

When it comes to supporting military strikes or supplying arms to countries in conflict, Malta typically adopts a cautious stance. The country is a strong believer in multilateralism and international law. Having initially opposed lifting the arms embargo that the EU imposed on Syria in May 2011 following an upsurge in violent conflict, Malta was later persuaded, along with the rest of the bloc, to end the embargo. More recently, Valletta supports the U.S.-led military strikes against Islamic State jihadists in Iraq.

#Malta is fully committed to the EU's CFSP.
 
Tweet This

Despite its military neutrality, Malta is fully committed to the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Maltese soldiers have taken part in a number of EU antipiracy missions off the coast of Somalia together with the Dutch navy. Considering that over half of the irregular migrants who land in Malta are Somalis, Malta has a direct interest in seeing Somalia return to stability.

On the question of irregular migration in general, successive Maltese governments have failed to convince their EU counterparts to adopt the concept of burden sharing. While the EU has provided Malta with funds to deal with this problem, member states have been reluctant to take in their share of refugees who end up in Malta. The burden was eased somewhat after Italy began its Mare Nostrum rescue operations following the tragic migrant shipwreck off the Italian island of Lampedusa in October 2013—although Rome’s decision to scale down these missions in November 2014 has caused some concern in Malta.

As for the crisis in Ukraine, Malta believes that the EU should continue its mediating and monitoring role and should insist that parties to the conflict in eastern Ukraine adhere to the February 12 ceasefire agreement. Despite a pledge by Malta’s Labour government in 2014 to strengthen ties with Moscow, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat made it clear that his country supported the imposition of sanctions against Russia for its behavior in Ukraine.

Malta has traditionally had good relations with China, and it is evident that Beijing sees Malta as an important foothold in the EU. The Labour government has been subjected to some criticism domestically for its close ties with China. A Chinese company, Shanghai Electric, has purchased 33 percent of the Maltese state energy company Enemalta as well as full control of one of its power stations.

The latest European Foreign Policy Scorecard published by the European Council on Foreign Relations categorized Malta as a “slacker”—together with Italy, Latvia, Portugal, and Romania—when it came to the promotion of human rights in China. Malta has said nothing about the pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong in late 2014.

#Malta tends to be a consensus seeker on EU foreign policy.
 
Tweet This

Malta believes both the EU and the United States stand to gain from a successful conclusion of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations as this would release the untapped economic potential of both sides. On the question of EU enlargement, Malta has always been in favor of the bloc’s expansion but seems to be in agreement with the overall sentiment in Brussels, namely that a pause is needed before the next expansion wave.

Located in the middle of the Mediterranean, Malta is ideally placed to contribute to the EU’s approach to its turbulent Southern neighborhood. And indeed, from the Libyan civil war to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Valletta has played a significant role on a number of issues that directly affect the EU’s security. That is not a bad record for the EU’s smallest member state.

Anthony Manduca is the Sunday executive and an international affairs analyst at the Times of Malta.

About the Author

Anthony Manduca

Times of Malta

Anthony Manduca
Times of Malta
Foreign PolicyEUEuropeWestern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Fog of AI War

    In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, AI warfare has come to dominate, with barely any oversight or accountability. Europe must lead the charge on the responsible use of new military technologies.

      Raluca Csernatoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How to Join the EU in Three Easy Steps

    Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.

      Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?

    Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing It

    Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Win or Lose, Orbán Has Broken Hungary’s Democracy

    Hungarians head to the polls on April 12 for an election of national and European consequence. Three different outcomes are on the cards, each with their own implications for the EU.

      Zsuzsanna Szelényi

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.