• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Strategic Europe",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Europe",
    "Eastern Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
Strategic Europe logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Strategic Europe

Grounded: Poland-Russia Relations

Five years since a Polish government aircraft crashed in western Russia, Moscow has yet to return the plane to Poland. The crash is still having political ramifications.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Apr 13, 2015
Strategic Europe

Blog

Strategic Europe

Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Learn More

On April 10, 2010, a Polish government aircraft attempted to land in dense fog in Smolensk, western Russia. Lech Kaczyński, then Poland’s president, was on the plane. He was leading a delegation of the country’s military and political top brass. They were traveling to Katyn to commemorate the seventieth anniversary of the murder of 20,000 Polish officers and prisoners of war by the Soviet Union’s secret police.

While attempting to land, the plane crashed. Everyone on board was killed. Poland went into shock. There was an enormous outpouring of grief. Russia also mourned. Vladimir Putin, who was prime minister of Russia at the time, was visibly shaken. Five years on, the plane crash remains a politically sensitive issue in both Moscow and Warsaw.

The immediate reaction by Russia to the crash was revealing. It showed the extent of the rapprochement between Poland and Russia. It also showed how the gradual reconciliation was a strategic decision aimed at changing the dynamics of the Russian-Polish relationship from emotion and suspicion to pragmatism and cooperation.

The rapprochement had begun in earnest when Poland’s center-right Civic Platform party, led by Donald Tusk, now president of the European Council, won the 2007 parliamentary election.

Days after the crash, Andrzej Wajda’s monumental film Katyń was shown on Russian television. Previously, Poland’s veteran movie director had been given only limited showings in Moscow. But then Putin gave the go-ahead for the release of a movie that showed the highly complicated relations between Russia and Poland.

During the weeks and months after the Smolensk tragedy, ties between Warsaw and Moscow improved. This was despite all the anti-Russian conspiracy theories swirling around at the time—propagated mostly by the conservative Law and Justice party, headed by Jarosław Kaczyński, the president’s twin brother.

In fact, the rapprochement was so positive that Russia, Poland, and Germany worked together to open the border between Kaliningrad province, a Russian exclave, and Poland. That move allowed the inhabitants of Kaliningrad city—previously Königsberg, the capital of the former German province of East Prussia—to travel to Poland visa free. It literally provided people living in the exclave with an open door to the European Union.

Arguably, opening the frontier with Kaliningrad was one of the crowning aspects of the Polish-Russian rapprochement. Arguably, too, the step had the makings of a unique Polish-German-Russian reconciliation, often unthinkable given Poland’s justified negative experiences with Germany and Russia, the two countries that occupied or divided Poland over the centuries.

Because of the #Ukraine crisis, little remains of the Polish-Russian rapprochement.
 
Tweet This

Today, because of the Ukraine crisis and the resulting clash between the West and Moscow, little remains of the Polish-Russian rapprochement.

Law and Justice may be vindicated. The party had consistently criticized Tusk’s moves toward warmer relations with Russia. It has used the crash and the conspiracy theories that went with it to try to discredit Civic Platform’s opening to Russia.

Details of the crash itself are still emerging. Two reports by the Polish military prosecutor’s office, one leaked as recently as April 8, revealed errors by the Polish crew. In addition, a senior general in the entourage allegedly encouraged the plane’s commander to land, despite poor visibility. There was criticism too of the air traffic control team at Smolensk.

Despite all the attempts by Poland to be open and professional about the causes of the crash, Russia has refused to return the crashed plane to Poland, for reasons never convincingly explained. By holding onto the plane, Russia seems to be playing with Polish internal politics.

The crash risks being used for political purposes in both Moscow and Warsaw. “It could be instrumentalized by Russia and by the [Polish] opposition,” said Marek Cichocki, political scientist at the Natolin European Center and former adviser to Lech Kaczyński.

Indeed. Poland is in the middle of a presidential election campaign. The incumbent Bronisław Komorowski, who is supported by the governing Civic Platform, has a comfortable lead in opinion polls over Andrzej Duda, the candidate of the Law and Justice party. The election will be held in May. Parliamentary elections will follow in September.

Duda has been careful not to use the plane crash to win votes. If anything, he has been trying to reach out to moderate voters to boost his party’s chances and show that it is more than a Euroskeptic, nationalist, and anti-Russian party. But playing the anti-Russia card cannot be ruled out.

The more Euroskeptic parties inside the EU, the greater the chance of disunity and incoherence.
 
Tweet This

Politically, it would suit Russia if Law and Justice won either the presidency or control of the Sejm, or Polish parliament. The more Euroskeptic parties in legislatures inside the EU, the greater the chance of disunity and incoherence.

Yet the Ukraine crisis has shown that despite the differences among member states over the EU’s sanctions policy against Russia, the EU has held together. And the Ukraine crisis has made many EU countries understand the relevance of NATO, particularly since the EU cannot provide any kind of security guarantees.

So if Russia believes that by delaying the return of the crashed plane to Poland it could influence the outcome of Poland’s presidential and parliamentary elections, it could miscalculate. It’s hard to see which Polish political party is prepared to do Russia any favors.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
SecurityForeign PolicyRussiaEuropeEastern Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Strategic Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Is France Shifting Rightward?

    The far right failed to win big in France’s municipal elections. But that’s not good news for the country’s left wing, which remained disunited while the broader right consolidated its momentum ahead of the 2027 presidential race.

      Catherine Fieschi

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?

    Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come Together

    The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.