Commentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
{
"authors": [
"Ulrich Speck"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"EU",
"Climate Change",
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Turning Tsipras’s Loss Into Victory
For Greece to transform its economy, the Greek government must start to see Brussels, Paris, and Berlin not as enemies but as partners for change.
By Ulrich Speck
Published on Jul 13, 2015
After almost seventeen hours of negotiations, on July 13 eurozone leaders struck a deal to offer Greece a third bailout package. Brokered by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President François Hollande, and European Council President Donald Tusk, the agreement seems to suggest that Germany’s game plan has worked—so far.
For weeks, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras had built his strategy on the belief that Grexit was not an option because Brussels, Berlin, and other EU capitals would be too afraid of the consequences. He thought that his negotiating position was much stronger than that of the rest of the eurozone. Getting fresh money from Greece’s international creditors without serious conditions being attached seemed possible.
Merkel undermined this strategy by presenting Grexit as a real policy option. (Whether she was really ready to cut Greece loose is something we will probably never know.) Suddenly, Tsipras understood that he had a weak hand. He had to largely comply with the conditions that the other eighteen eurozone members had set for a third Greek bailout. An overwhelming majority of Greeks see their country’s membership in the EU and the eurozone as a guarantee of domestic prosperity and stability. For Athens, Grexit is not an option.
In the great eurozone poker game, Merkel has won—at least the current round. She demonstrated leadership by moving Greece to agree to a deal that indeed makes sense, for two reasons: First, if Greece complies to the conditions set, the Greek state will likely be in better shape than it is now, as will its economy. Second, the deal with its tough conditions is likely to be acceptable to those who will have to finance it, namely the taxpayers in the other eurozone countries.
The best-case scenario for the weeks and months ahead would be for Tsipras to start to play ball by transforming himself into the domestic leader of reform, pushing hard against privileged groups and building capable state institutions.
Reform is a tough business, as Central and Eastern Europeans know—probably better than Western Europeans, given Central and Eastern Europe’s recent history of transformation. Reform is divisive as it implies a power struggle among elites. Those who have managed to make the state work on behalf their private interests won’t easily give up on their privileges. That can be seen today in Ukraine, where oligarchs are determined to cling to their special interests despite Kiev’s efforts at reform.
But reforms can succeed, as they have in many Central European countries in recent decades. For Greece to transform, the Greek government must start to see Brussels, Paris, and Berlin not as enemies but as partners for change. Tsipras now must step up and lead his country out of its current mess. The latest agreement with Brussels may become a first stride along that road. Otherwise, the deal may become just another step on the long and painful path toward Grexit.
About the Author
Ulrich Speck
Former Visiting Scholar, Carnegie Europe
Speck was a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on the European Union’s foreign policy and Europe’s strategic role in a changing global environment.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran
- Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not LessCommentary
Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.
Dimitar Bechev
- Europe on Iran: Gone with the WindCommentary
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont
- Taking the Pulse: Can European Defense Survive the Death of FCAS?Commentary
France and Germany’s failure to agree on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) raises questions about European defense. Amid industrial rivalries and competing strategic cultures, what does the future of European military industrial projects look like?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Macron Makes France a Great Middle PowerCommentary
France has stopped clinging to notions of being a great power and is embracing the middle power moment. But Emmanuel Macron has his work cut out if he is to secure his country’s global standing before his term in office ends.
Rym Momtaz
