Commentary
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is about to give her annual address on the state of the EU. Here’s what she won’t—but should—say.
Rym Momtaz
{
"authors": [
"Ulrich Speck"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"EU",
"Climate Change",
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Turning Tsipras’s Loss Into Victory
For Greece to transform its economy, the Greek government must start to see Brussels, Paris, and Berlin not as enemies but as partners for change.
By Ulrich Speck
Published on Jul 13, 2015
After almost seventeen hours of negotiations, on July 13 eurozone leaders struck a deal to offer Greece a third bailout package. Brokered by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President François Hollande, and European Council President Donald Tusk, the agreement seems to suggest that Germany’s game plan has worked—so far.
For weeks, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras had built his strategy on the belief that Grexit was not an option because Brussels, Berlin, and other EU capitals would be too afraid of the consequences. He thought that his negotiating position was much stronger than that of the rest of the eurozone. Getting fresh money from Greece’s international creditors without serious conditions being attached seemed possible.
Merkel undermined this strategy by presenting Grexit as a real policy option. (Whether she was really ready to cut Greece loose is something we will probably never know.) Suddenly, Tsipras understood that he had a weak hand. He had to largely comply with the conditions that the other eighteen eurozone members had set for a third Greek bailout. An overwhelming majority of Greeks see their country’s membership in the EU and the eurozone as a guarantee of domestic prosperity and stability. For Athens, Grexit is not an option.
In the great eurozone poker game, Merkel has won—at least the current round. She demonstrated leadership by moving Greece to agree to a deal that indeed makes sense, for two reasons: First, if Greece complies to the conditions set, the Greek state will likely be in better shape than it is now, as will its economy. Second, the deal with its tough conditions is likely to be acceptable to those who will have to finance it, namely the taxpayers in the other eurozone countries.
The best-case scenario for the weeks and months ahead would be for Tsipras to start to play ball by transforming himself into the domestic leader of reform, pushing hard against privileged groups and building capable state institutions.
Reform is a tough business, as Central and Eastern Europeans know—probably better than Western Europeans, given Central and Eastern Europe’s recent history of transformation. Reform is divisive as it implies a power struggle among elites. Those who have managed to make the state work on behalf their private interests won’t easily give up on their privileges. That can be seen today in Ukraine, where oligarchs are determined to cling to their special interests despite Kiev’s efforts at reform.
But reforms can succeed, as they have in many Central European countries in recent decades. For Greece to transform, the Greek government must start to see Brussels, Paris, and Berlin not as enemies but as partners for change. Tsipras now must step up and lead his country out of its current mess. The latest agreement with Brussels may become a first stride along that road. Otherwise, the deal may become just another step on the long and painful path toward Grexit.
About the Author
Ulrich Speck
Former Visiting Scholar, Carnegie Europe
Speck was a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on the European Union’s foreign policy and Europe’s strategic role in a changing global environment.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- The Speech Ursula von der Leyen Can’t Deliver
- Europe Fails to Learn the Lessons from CeutaCommentary
The aftermath of the Ceuta crisis shows Europe has drawn the wrong lessons. Rather than doubling down on failed migration policies, the EU needs to address the underlying roots of such episodes.
Richard Youngs
- Germany’s Shattered ConsensusCommentary
An overwhelming victory by a far-right-wing party in a small state in eastern Germany will have major repercussions for Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s coalition.
Judy Dempsey
- Taking the Pulse: Is Canada Leading a Third Way?Commentary
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has twice inspired praise for standing up to U.S. President Donald Trump: at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos and on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. Is Carney showing a third way better than the EU has in dealing with the Trump administration?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Europe’s Self-Confidence ProblemCommentary
The EU’s responses to two recent incidents expose the gulf between European perceptions and capabilities. Unless the union can bridge that gap, it will never become a real geostrategic power.
Rym Momtaz
