• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Alexey Malashenko"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The Olympic Threat

Probably for the first time in the history of the Olympics, sports-related issues concerning the Games took a back seat to the issues of security. Keeping the Sochi Olympics safe is a matter of Russia’s political prestige, as well as the evidence of its ability to respond to terrorism.

Link Copied
By Alexey Malashenko
Published on Jan 23, 2014

Reading the Sochi Olympics media coverage, one may get the impression that those behind it would be very surprised if the Olympics actually went without a hitch. Probably for the first time in the history of the Olympics, sports-related issues took a back seat to the issues of security. From this standpoint, these are perhaps the most politicized Olympics since the 1980 Moscow Games, which were boycotted by the United States and other major sports powers in the aftermath of the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan.

Keeping the Games safe is a matter of Russia’s political prestige, as well as the evidence of its ability to respond to one of its major internal challenges, which also has a direct bearing on Russia’s external politics. Russia appears more vulnerable to the acts of terror than other countries, with the obvious exception of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Arab states. Apart from the perennially unstable North Caucasus, terrorist attacks are carried out in other Russian regions, including Moscow. The last three explosions in Volgograd, in October and December 2013, have demonstrated how vulnerable Russia is in the face of terror. Some think that by concentrating all the security efforts around Sochi, the authorities might enable terrorists to act as they please in other regions.

If the terrorists actually manage to penetrate into Sochi, it will to some extent devalue Russia’s security and stability-based foreign policy agenda. It will adversely affect President Vladimir Putin’s popularity, since he will be the one held primarily responsible for the terrorist incidents.

Putin took the risk right from the start, when he proposed that Sochi host the Olympics. As the games draw closer, the risk becomes increasingly evident. Those getting ready to head for Sochi are bound to be asked, “Aren’t you scared?” Attending the Games resembles extreme tourism of sorts (an acquaintance of mine was considering a similar business venture after the end of the second war in Chechnya).

I do not want to discuss where the threat to Sochi comes from, how it is to materialize, and which terrorist factions are more dangerous than others. I will only mention the so-called “ghost” suicide bombers, which the media has been reporting on literally in the last few days. No one yet really knows where these “ghosts” come from.

One more thing comes to mind in this respect. How will the authorities react if something indeed happens in Sochi? Who will they take their grief and desperation out on through accusations of aiding and abetting the terrorists?

But what a sigh of relief will the Kremlin breathe if everything goes as planned. What a match it will win! And against what adversary! Keeping Sochi safe will be the most valuable gold medal for Putin and his Kremlin Olympic team. Some will even believe for a while that the authorities have found a working remedy against terrorism.

We do not yet know the final score of the Russian Security Forces vs. the Terrorists United game. Whatever we think of the current regime, let us wish success to the Team Russia.

About the Author

Alexey Malashenko

Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program

Malashenko is a former chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Religion, Society, and Security Program.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    What Will Uzbekistan’s New President Do?

      Alexey Malashenko

  • Commentary
    Preserving the Calm in Russia’s Muslim Community

      Alexey Malashenko

Alexey Malashenko
Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program
Alexey Malashenko
Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyCaucasusRussia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Paper
    Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with China

    After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.

      Saheb Singh Chadha

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTA

    The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead

      Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki

  • Article
    India’s Oil Security Strategy: Structural Vulnerabilities and Strategic Choices

    This piece argues that the present Indian strategy, based on opportunistic diversification and utilization of limited strategic reserves, remains inadequate when confronting supply disruptions. It evaluates India’s options in the short, medium, and long terms.

      Vrinda Sahai

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.