Matthew Rojansky
{
"authors": [
"Matthew Rojansky"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Syria",
"Caucasus",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Opposition Rally in Moscow Draws Tens of Thousands
The recent public protests in Moscow differ from those in December and March because so far, they seem centered in Moscow, while the previous protests were widespread throughout the country.
Source: CTV

- Russian Domestic Protests: Evaluating the recent large protest in Moscow during the national holiday, Rojansky said that unlike the protests in the December and March, which were widespread throughout the country, the current movement is centered in Moscow. “The negative there is that it is isolated, and that it doesn’t speak for the country as a whole,” he said. “The positive for the protesters is that they are in the media spotlight.” He concluded, “The fact that there has not been violence is good for protesters but it is also good for Putin. At a certain point, violence is going to tarnish Putin’s image and reputation and will bring more people out on the streets.”
- Russia’s Relationship with Syria: Recently, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested that Moscow might be sending attack helicopters to Syria. Rojansky commented on the possibility, saying “if it is true, that is a big if, and if this is an immediate delivery of attack helicopters, then that would be a real departure from Russia’s commitment to Syria.” He added, “it could be because simply one hand doesn’t know what the other hand is doing-that is, sometimes the Russian defense export industry is following through deals they think of as long-term arrangements irrespective of what the state of political play is.” He suggested that there is a third possible interpretation. “Another reason could be that the Russians are playing both sides of the game. We heard a couple of weeks ago that the Russians were prepared to talk about a post-Assad scenario, but obviously if they are supplying Assad with weapons he can use to effectively obliterate the rebels from the air, they are definitely playing for both sides,” he said.
About the Author
Former Deputy Director, Russia and Eurasia Program
Rojansky, formerly executive director of the Partnership for a Secure America, is an expert on U.S. and Russian national security and nuclear-weapon policies.
- An Opportunity for Ambition: Ukraine’s OSCE ChairmanshipPaper
- Presiding Over the OSCE: Challenges and OpportunitiesIn The Media
Matthew Rojansky
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- The Gulf Conflict and the South CaucasusCommentary
In an interview, Sergei Melkonian discusses Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s careful balancing act among the United States, Israel, and Iran.
Armenak Tokmajyan
- Syria Skirts the Conflict With IranCommentary
In an interview, Kheder Khaddour explains that Damascus is trying to stabilize its borders, but avoiding war isn’t guaranteed.
Michael Young
- Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.Commentary
Just look at Iraq in 1991.
Marwan Muasher
- Axis of Resistance or Suicide?Commentary
As Iran defends its interests in the region and its regime’s survival, it may push Hezbollah into the abyss.
Michael Young
- Can the Gulf Cooperation Council Transcend Its Divisions?Article
Without structural reform, the organization, which is racked by internal rivalries, risks sliding into irrelevance.
Hesham Alghannam