Commentary
Nathan J. Brown
{
"authors": [
"Nathan J. Brown"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Members of Congress Urged to Cut Aid to Egypt
Members of Congress have begun to call for cuts in the $1.5 billion in military aid given to Egypt each year, as political violence increases in the country.
Published on Aug 19, 2013
Source: NPR
The Egyptian political scene is currently domestically focused and the last thing the political actors want to do is listen to outsider’s advice, explained Carnegie’s Nathan Brown on NPR. He stated that Egypt’s political actors are extremely focused on each other and involved in what they see as a struggle over Egypt’s identity and future, which, he added, is why the United States is having such a hard time influencing the military’s generals.Last week, the Egyptian military brushed off U.S. efforts to negotiate a peaceful compromise with opposition protestors. As the violence increases in Egypt, members of Congress have begun to call for cuts in the $1.5 billion in military aid given to the country each year.
“Most political actors do not see the United States as on their side and that even extends to the Egyptian military despite all that aid,” Brown explained. He said that the military leaders are convinced that the United States still looks at things in the country through the lens of the Morsi presidency that was just overthrown. The United States is too closely identified with Morsi, he contended.
Brown argued that if U.S.-Egyptian relations were to fall apart, Egyptian foreign policy would not radically change under the new regime but there would be far less coordination in regional security issues, such as terrorism and Arab-Israeli diplomacy. Cuts in U.S. aid would make diplomacy and American security policy harder to operate in the region, he added, concluding that the aid is a very important part of the Egyptian military’s calculations.
About the Author
Nathan J. Brown
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, is a distinguished scholar and author of nine books on Arab politics and governance, as well as editor of five books.
- Trump’s Plan for Gaza Is Not Irrelevant. It’s Worse.
- Israel’s Forever WarsCommentary
Nathan J. Brown
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- Egypt’s Discrete Role in the Ceasefire with IranCommentary
Cairo’s efforts send a message to the United States and the region that it still has a place at the diplomatic table.
Angie Omar
- Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.Commentary
Just look at Iraq in 1991.
Marwan Muasher
- When Football Is More Than FootballCommentary
The recent African Cup of Nations tournament in Morocco touched on issues that largely transcended the sport.
Issam Kayssi, Yasmine Zarhloule
- Iran and the New Geopolitical MomentCommentary
A coalition of states is seeking to avert a U.S. attack, and Israel is in the forefront of their mind.
Michael Young
- Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring IranCommentary
Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.
Bashir Kitachaev
