• Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Middle East logoCarnegie lettermark logo
LebanonIran
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "Pakistan",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Modi’s Pakistan Opportunity

Delhi’s entrenched pessimism on Pakistan is not in tune with the interests of a large number of political constituencies that want a more relaxed relationship between the two countries.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Dec 29, 2015

Source: Indian Express

The conventional wisdom in Delhi is that a serious engagement with Pakistan is not worth the trouble. It is no surprise, therefore, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s bold outreach to Pakistan has generated little enthusiasm among Delhi’s talking heads. But look beyond Delhi, and you might notice considerable support — including from many of the PM’s sworn political adversaries.

Consider, for example, the reactions to Modi’s Christmas Day para-drop on Lahore. The Congress party was quick to scoff at the government’s flip-flops on Pakistan. It is plain that the Congress is merely doing what the BJP did to it during the decade-long UPA rule.

The NDA, which initiated the peace process with Pakistan under far more difficult circumstances, was quick to attack Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for staying the course that his predecessor, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, had set for Pakistan.

Ignore the revenge politics of the Congress, and the picture gets very interesting. There is probably no political formation in the country that is more hostile to the PM and his ideological “parivar” than the Communist parties. But the CPI and CPM were among the first to welcome Modi’s Pakistan initiative. The Indian communists, after all, are programmatically committed to finding peace with Pakistan.

In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Prasad and Nitish Kumar are equally committed to good neighbourly relations with Pakistan. As the inheritors of Ram Manohar Lohia’s socialist legacy, these “backward” leaders have long championed secularism at home and normalisation of relations with Pakistan.

Nitish Kumar, who is emerging as a rallying figure for the anti-BJP forces in the heartland, made a very impressive visit to Pakistan as chief minister of Bihar in 2012. President Asif Ali Zardari hosted him for a banquet and there was much talk of Pakistan learning from Bihar’s turnaround under Nitish Kumar.

Turn your gaze to the states bordering Pakistan in the north-west, and you will find near unanimous political support for Modi’s outreach to Nawaz Sharif. In the Kashmir valley, the ruling People’s Democratic Party, the opposition National Conference and the separatist groups have all supported Modi’s effort to renew the dialogue with Pakistan.

In Punjab, the Shiromani Akali Dal, the BJP’s long-standing political partner, has long sought normalisation of relations with Pakistan. Parkash Singh Badal, the veteran Akali leader and chief minister of Punjab, was on the bus that took Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee across the Wagah border in February 1999.

At the end of 2012, Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal had visited Lahore and unveiled an agenda for comprehensive cooperation between the two Punjabs. But as military tensions on the border escalated soon after, the Akali hopes turned sour.

Much credit for promoting cooperation across the Radcliffe Line in Punjab should go to the Congress leader, Captain Amarinder Singh, who was chief minister during 2002-07, for launching a very promising set of exchanges with the provincial government in Lahore. No wonder, the captain’s response to Modi’s Pakistan surprise visit was very different from the churlishness of Congress leaders in Delhi.

In Punjab, which paid with its blood for the Partition of the province and the subcontinent, there is great yearning today for reconciliation.

That sentiment extends to Haryana, which was once part of undivided Punjab. When the peace process began to gain traction in 2004, the then chief minister of Haryana, Omprakash Chautala, visited Pakistan to seek greater transborder cooperation.

Modi can easily build on the aspirations in the western states by encouraging the chief ministers of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana — to establish contact and communication with their counterparts in Sindh, Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. All of them either belong to the BJP or its allies.
Jammu and Kashmir, of course, is in a category all of its own. The BJP, which is ruling the state in coalition with the PDP, is already committed to a substantive agenda of cooperation with Pakistan Occupied Kashmir.

The common minimum programme of the two parties issued earlier this year wants to enhance “people to people contact” across the LoC, take “travel, commerce, trade and business across the LoC to the next level” and open “new routes across all three regions to enhancing connectivity.”

What comes across is a very important political fact: Delhi’s entrenched pessimism on Pakistan is not in tune with the interests of a large number of political constituencies that want a more relaxed relationship between the two countries.

If he can unleash these positive forces and check the sceptics in his own party, Modi might generate a strong domestic support base for his Pakistan initiative. That in turn would make it a lot easier for the PM to handle the many imponderables in engaging Pakistan and experiment with a range of new diplomatic initiatives.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicySouth AsiaPakistanIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

  • people watching smoke rising at sunrise from rooftops
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.

    Just look at Iraq in 1991.

      Marwan Muasher

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Iran and the New Geopolitical Moment

    A coalition of states is seeking to avert a U.S. attack, and Israel is in the forefront of their mind.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring Iran

    Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Iran’s Woes Aren’t Only Domestic

    The country’s leadership is increasingly uneasy about multiple challenges from the Levant to the South Caucasus.

      Armenak Tokmajyan

  • A municipal employee raises the US flag among those of other nations in Sharm el-Sheikh, as the Egyptian Red Sea resort town gets ready to receive international leaders, following a Gaza ceasefire agreement, on October 11, 2025.
    Article
    The Tragedy of Middle Eastern Politics

    The countries of the region have engaged in sustained competition that has tested their capacities and limitations, while resisting domination by rivals. Can a more stable order emerge from this maelstrom, and what would it require?

      • Mohamed Ali Adraoui

      Hamza Meddeb, Mohamed Ali Adraoui

Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Carnegie Middle East logo, white
  • Research
  • Diwan
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.