• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Andrey Pertsev"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Carnegie Politika",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Domestic Politics",
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Politika

Auditing the Auditors: Does Putin Trust Anyone Now?

Age and isolation are fueling Putin’s desire for greater control over Russia’s bureaucracy. Even long-standing colleagues are not above suspicion.

Link Copied
By Andrey Pertsev
Published on Mar 24, 2025
Carnegie Politika

Blog

Carnegie Politika

Carnegie Politika is a digital publication that features unmatched analysis and insight on Russia, Ukraine and the wider region. For nearly a decade, Carnegie Politika has published contributions from members of Carnegie’s global network of scholars and well-known outside contributors and has helped drive important strategic conversations and policy debates.

Learn More

A new type of Russian bureaucrat has emerged in recent years: those appointed by President Vladimir Putin to oversee certain agencies or sectors, and keep an eye on the officials formally in charge—even those who ostensibly enjoy the Kremlin’s trust. These “auditors” can now be found everywhere: from the Russian delegation conducting negotiations with the United States to the Defense Ministry, the Emergencies Ministry, and the presidential administration.  

It’s all strikingly reminiscent of the Soviet-era practice of installing KGB operatives in companies and government agencies. The only difference is that today these are not security officers, but men and women from the extended “Putin family” and his inner circle. While these appointments help to reassure Putin that he remains in control, they also threaten to undermine the viability of Russia’s power vertical.

For a long time, Russia’s bureaucracy functioned according to the principle of “one agency, one team.” Ministers or agency heads were given carte blanche to appoint whom they wanted. As a result, the Finance Ministry is staffed by those close to Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and all the key positions in Russia’s Far East are controlled by the Kremlin’s representative to that region, Yuri Trutnev.

It’s recently become clear, however, that the president does not trust even long-serving officials, and has decided to create a new tier of bureaucracy to oversee them.

One example of such an “auditor” is Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), who is closely involved in negotiations between Moscow and Washington over the war in Ukraine. In recent months, Dmitriev has been paving the way for talks to take place, seeking out areas of common ground between the Kremlin and the Trump administration. Dmitriev secured his spot in the delegation through being acquainted with U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. But he is also an old friend of Putin’s daughter, Yekaterina Tikhonova. In other words, he represents the Putin family at the negotiations.

In short, Dmitriev is there to keep an eye on the other members of the delegation (including long-serving and trusted associates of Putin like Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov). If necessary, Dmitriev will be able to provide an alternative analysis and put forward different options.

This is far from a unique case. Sergei Tsivilev, the husband of Putin’s first cousin once removed Anna Tsivileva, was made energy minister last year to oversee Putin’s old friends in the energy sector: Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin, Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller, and businessman Gennady Timchenko.

Putin’s hankering after ever-greater control means he has even appointed auditors to keep tabs on the auditors. Putin’s longtime adviser Andrei Belousov was made defense minister to oversee the agency’s huge wartime budget after a series of corruption scandals. However, Belousov did not receive full control over the ministry. In a break with tradition, he was not given free choice in the selection of his deputies, who include Putin’s cousin Anna Tsivileva, Pavel Fradkov (the son of former prime minister Mikhail Fradkov), and Leonid Gorin, who is close to Siluanov. As a result, the Defense Ministry is currently run by a group of auditors, each keeping tabs on another, instead of a unified team.

Something similar has happened at the Emergencies Ministry, which has been headed by Putin’s former bodyguard Alexander Kurenkov since 2022. Even though Kurenkov’s main qualification for the job is his loyalty to Putin, that was apparently not enough. At the beginning of 2025, Putin made Denis Popov, a former prosecutor, one of Kurenkov’s deputies. Popov quickly became the ministry’s point man for communication with other ministries, the Kremlin, and parliament. In other words, Putin appointed one trusted official to keep an eye on another trusted official.

There is an even more complicated setup at the presidential directorate for state humanitarian policy (a department of the presidential administration established in 2024). The man put in charge of overseeing this directorate was Vladimir Medinsky, a former culture minister close to Putin, and his informal brief was to oversee the work of Kremlin deputy chief of staff Sergei Kiriyenko, who is responsible for domestic policy and ideology. However, Medinsky was not allowed to choose who would run the directorate he was charged with monitoring, since he himself is under supervision. For this purpose, it has been entrusted to former security officer Vyacheslav Bocharnikov.

As a former security officer himself, Putin is very familiar with such arrangements. Every state agency and major enterprise in the Soviet Union had someone affiliated with the KGB on staff: to monitor the mood, hunt for dissidents, and report up the food chain. But the appointment of these modern “auditors” also reflects how age and isolation have amplified Putin’s already distrustful nature.

This practice will inevitably lead to the elite beginning to doubt the authority of ministers and agency heads and seeking out the shadowy figures who are “really” in charge. Such speculative conversations are already becoming more and more common. For example, who is really pulling the strings at the Defense Ministry: Belousov or presidential adviser Alexei Dyumin?

It will also lead to officials at all levels looking to those wielding informal power as likely successors to the heads of ministries and agencies. And that will create an atmosphere of suspicion, conflict, and denunciation.

For now, these “auditors” are only to be found in agencies (like the Emergencies Ministry and the Defense Ministry) or sectors (like negotiations with the U.S.) that are of particular importance to Putin. But the practice is spreading, and Putin’s paranoia risks endangering the system’s internal unity and cohesion.

About the Author

Andrey Pertsev

Andrey Pertsev is a journalist with Meduza website.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Could the Rise of the New People Party Reshape Russia’s Managed Political System?

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Blocking of Telegram App Sparks Rare Public Rift Among Russia’s Elites

      Andrey Pertsev

Andrey Pertsev

Andrey Pertsev is a journalist with Meduza website.

Andrey Pertsev
SecurityDomestic PoliticsPolitical ReformRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Politika

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Pashinyan’s Parliamentary Victory Mean for Armenia’s Future?

    Pashinyan’s pro-European party has been re-elected with a decisive victory. But the pro-Russian opposition could still slow Armenia’s progress toward peace with Azerbaijan and rapprochement with Europe.

      Mikayel Zolyan

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Will Russia–Armenia Relations Improve Following Pashinyan’s Re-Election?

    For all the menacing rhetoric, the Armenian prime minister remains a leader with whom Putin is prepared to interact: not as an ally, but as a partner, albeit a problematic one.

      • Alexander Atasuntsev

      Alexander Atasuntsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The World According to Putin: No Deal on Ukraine in Sight

    The issue is not that the president only has selective information at his disposal, but that the decision-making process consists of one person with an unshakeable vision of how the world works.

      Tatiana Stanovaya

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Does Azerbaijan Want to See Win Armenia’s Elections?

    By fueling the arguments of both supporters and opponents of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Azerbaijan wants to ensure he is re-elected with a weaker mandate.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

    A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.  

      Alexandra Prokopenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.