• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Taiya M. Smith"
  ],
  "type": "testimony",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia",
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Testimony

International Climate Change Policy

As the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, China will be central to efforts to combat global climate change at Copenhagen and beyond.

Link Copied
By Taiya M. Smith
Published on Nov 17, 2009

Source: Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Please Download Flash

As the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China will be central to efforts to combat global climate change at Copenhagen and beyond. In testimony before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Taiya Smith explains that China is serious about addressing climate change, and assesses the implications and opportunities presented by its recent efforts to reduce carbon emissions at home.

Current realties in China:

  • China’s actions to address climate change should be taken seriously. To maintain national stability and GDP growth, China has concluded that it must address environmental degradation and climate change. Additionally, China long ago concluded that reliance on foreign oil creates considerable political difficulties.
     
  • If present trends continue, China is on pace to meet its emissions targets: reducing energy intensity by 20 percent between 2005 and 2010, obtaining 15 percent of the nation’s energy supply from non-fossil fuels by 2020, and increasing forest coverage and stock volumes 20 percent above 2005 levels by 2020.

U.S. Policy Recommendations:

  • Establishing an international body that allows countries to monitor one another’s emissions and provides a mechanism (similar to the WTO) to resolve disputes could be one of the most effective ways to both ensure that China develops a strong internal monitoring system and that the international community can engage with China on the data that it issues.
     
  • Access to the joint American-Chinese market will be a critical motivator for the development and dissemination of clean technology. The United States needs to work with the Chinese to ensure that we keep our markets open to each other by creating policies that encourage competition in clean technology. Specifically, our two countries need to:
    • Develop shared standards for new technology;
    • Drop barriers to access and investment in each other’s markets;
    • Implement the right set of incentives to encourage competition in this rapidly expanding sector.
       

About the Author

Taiya M. Smith

Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program, Asia Program

Smith has spent the last decade working in international negotiations. Most recently, she served as a member of Secretary Hank Paulson’s senior management team from 2006 to 2009 as the deputy chief of staff and executive secretary for the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

    Recent Work

  • Other
    Why Go Strategic?: The Value of a Truly Strategic Dialogue Between the United States and China

      Taiya M. Smith

  • Article
    After Copenhagen

      Uri Dadush, Vera Eidelman, Taiya M. Smith

Taiya M. Smith
Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program, Asia Program
Taiya M. Smith
Climate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?

    Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle East

    The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lukashenko’s Bromance With Trump Has a Sell-By Date

    Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?

    Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.   

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.