• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Transatlantic Cooperation"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "North America",
    "Southern, Eastern, and Western Africa"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

Europe and America: Ignore Mali at your Peril

Europeans and Americans need to pay attention to the dangerous terrorist threat that is developing in sub-Saharan Africa.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Jun 13, 2012

Source: Munich Calling

Europeans and Americans need to wake up- They urgently need to pay attention to the dangerous terrorist threat that is developing in sub-Sahara Africa. Mali, a country the size of France and the Benelux combined, is poised to become a safe haven for Al-Qaeda, jihadists and criminal networks.

So great is the fear of this happening, that neighboring countries are asking France, the former colonial power in the region, and the European Union to step in. Niger’s Prime Minister, Brigi Rafini lobbied Brussels earlier this month to raise the alarm. He told Jose Manuel Barroso, the EU’s Commission president, just how dangerous the situation had become. Al-Qaeda was in a position to use Mali as a launching pad for the entire region.

In Mali, the rise of Ansar al-Din, Islamic fundamentalists who are very close to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM, began when al-Qaeda militants who were driven out of Afghanistan, strengthened their bases in Yemen, Sudan, Somalia and further west.

Mali, which had been considered one of Africa’s more peaceful, stable and democratic countries, provided an ideal breeding ground for Ansar al-Din. The organization was able to exploit both divisions inside the country and the fall out from the Arab Spring.

Since the fall of the Qaddafi regime, Tuareg mercenaries from northern Mali, Niger and Algeria, who had been in the pay of the late Muammar Qaddafi, returned home. This influx of well-armed fighters into northern Mali gave the Tuareg separatist movement there such a boost that it managed to drive out the Mali military and proclaim an independent state called Azawad.

To gain access to guns and money, the Tuareg nationalists, in spite of being a secular movement, then teamed up with the Islamic fundamentalist movement of Ansar al-Din, the “defenders of the faith”. It is far from clear if this accord will hold. The Tuareg tribe is divided over the deal especially when Ansar al-Din announced its intentions to impose Shari’ah law and expel all non-Muslim non-governmental organizations.

Still, France is extremely worried. In March, the French foreign minister Alain Juppe was warned by Mali’s neighbors that the region risked becoming a “west African Afghanistan” if Ansar al-Din gained control of the north. In the meantime, the south of Mali also got embroiled in conflict. In March, the army staged a coup in the capital, Bamako, because it was frustrated that it had not been given sufficient resources to defeat the rebellion in the north.

While military officers agreed to support an interim civilian government, the junta is still very much in control. The public does not support the junta but has some sympathy for its cause. The former government led by President Amadolu Toumani Toure neglected to provide basic services, denying young people a proper education and thus a perspective in life.

With such turmoil in the south of the country, it is difficult to see how the junta or the interim civilian government can contain the influence of Ansar al-Din and deal with the prospect of a divided country. Clearly, this is not the time for the United States and Europe to sit around and wait for things to get worse in this part of western Africa. The fear of contagion is all too great.

Even before Francois Hollande was elected President of France, his foreign policy advisors discussed in Washington how the U.S. and France could work together in Africa. "There is a risk that it could be the same in (other) parts of the Sahel, and we know that the instability in Mali could also spread to neighboring countries,” Anders Piebalgs, the EU Development Commissioner said recently.

Yet so far, the EU, has only reacted by suspending its development aid projects in Mali. That is not a strategy. What other options are there? Clearly, both Europe and the U.S. need to work intensely with the civilian government in Bamako as well as with the secular Tuaregs to find ways to counter the Islamist influence.

Western countries will probably also have to assist with food distribution and help retrain Mali’s army. Can anyone imagine how much more dangerous the world could become if Mali was ruled by al-Qaeda and then al-Qaeda set its sights on its northern neighbors, Algeria, Libya and Egypt, not to mention Mauritania to the west and Niger to the east?

Making Mali safe again, is an enormous task – and one that Europe and America will ignore at their peril.

This article was originally published in the Munich Security Conference's Munich Calling.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
Foreign PolicyEuropeNorth AmericaSouthern, Eastern, and Western Africa

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Exporting Its Fuel Crisis to Central Asia

    When faced with fuel shortages in the past, Central Asian governments could always count on additional supplies from Moscow. That safety net no longer exists.

      Galiya Ibragimova

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?

    Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.

      Leonid Bershidsky

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the Kremlin

    Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.

      Konstantin Skorkin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Moldova’s Ruling Party PAS Must Graduate From Crisis Management to State Governance

    Whether PAS can refocus on the unfinished business of state-building may ultimately prove more consequential for Moldova’s European future than the pace of its accession negotiations.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lukashenko’s Concessions to Kyiv Reflect Russia’s Weakness

    The recent damage inflicted by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russia has made Belarus aware of its own vulnerabilities—and surprisingly amenable to Kyiv’s demands.

      Artyom Shraibman

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.