• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Central Asia",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade",
    "Climate Change",
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

From a Greater Europe to a Greater Asia?

A Greater Asia, stretching from Shanghai to St. Petersburg, could transform the entire continent of Eurasia and have a significant impact on the global balance of power.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin
Published on Feb 26, 2015
Project hero Image

Project

Eurasia in Transition

Learn More

Source: Global Times

A year ago, Russia's foreign policy universe changed dramatically. After the overthrow in February 2014 of then Ukraine president Viktor Yanukovych and the arrival of nationalist and pro-Western forces in power in Kiev, the Ukrainian crisis led to Russia's confrontation with the US and its estrangement from Europe. By contrast, Moscow's relations with Beijing have grown visibly closer since then, going way beyond the "marriage of convenience" model that some scholars once devised to describe them. If the current situation persists, the Sino-Russian entente may become a more salient feature of international relations.

China and Russia, of course, will not establish a military alliance. There is no need for that now in the form of a common military threat, and a peacetime alliance between Moscow and Beijing on a NATO model would be unworkable in the absence of a clear hegemon commanding unquestionable loyalty and committed to protecting its junior partner. At this point, neither government is considering an alliance-type relationship, and only small minorities in each country's elites are even willing to discuss it. The broader publics are totally unmoved by such a prospect.

The two countries, however, are cooperating more closely than before. In May, Chinese President Xi Jinping will review the military parade in Red Square to mark the 70th anniversary of victory over Nazi Germany. In September, Russian President Vladimir Putin will return the compliment by visiting Beijing to celebrate the anniversary of the end of the WWII, to which the former Soviet Union substantially contributed.

10 years after the Russian forces and the PLA began exercising together, this year they are taking the show of Sino-Russian defense cooperation to a new theater: the Mediterranean. This step can presage more intimate coordination of Russia's and China's policies in the Middle East. There are also some indications that Moscow may agree to transfer more sophisticated military technology to Beijing.

There has been a lot of skepticism, not only in the West, but in China and Russia as well, about the recent gas deals between Gazprom and CNPC. Some key details are still unknown to the wider public, and all sorts of doubts about the future persist. However, with Russian gas reaching China for the first time in a few years, and Chinese companies finally getting access to Russian hydrocarbon resources, the energy relationship between the two countries is on the way to becoming an energy partnership. Russia will not dominate the Chinese natural gas market the way it has dominated Europe's, but the geoeconomic importance of opening the Chinese market to Russia can be compared to the arrival of Russian gas in Western Europe in the 1970s.

Similarly, there is much speculation about Sino-Russian competition in Central Asia. The inauguration of the Eurasian Economic Union this year has coincided with the announcement of the Chinese plans for the Silk Road economic belt area. Since the end of the Soviet Union, Moscow's influence in Central Asia has waned, while Beijing's has soared. Yet, it is more likely that the future will bring some kind of an economic interaction between the Russian efforts and the Chinese plans in Central Asia than some kind of geopolitical rivalry along the lines of what is happening in Ukraine. Russia itself may buy into China-proposed infrastructure projects, connecting East Asia to Europe across Eurasia.

The rupture in EU-Russian ties makes the failure of Putin's pet project of a Greater Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok very probable. The alternative is clear to see: a Greater Asia, from Shanghai to St. Petersburg. This may not be what many Russians have expected, or would prefer. Yet, this may be the reality that will transform the entire continent of Eurasia, elevate China still more, and give Russia a very different role from the one it traditionally imagined. If that happens, and a continental Asia will emerge as a loose unit, with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as its political, economic and security forum, this will also impact the global balance of power. The process of change has already started.

This article originally appeared in Global Times.

About the Author

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space

      Dmitri Trenin

  • Commentary
    What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West Revealed

      Dmitri Trenin

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
EconomyTradeClimate ChangeSecurityMilitaryForeign PolicyEast AsiaChinaCentral AsiaRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?

    Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting

    The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Can the Disparate Threads of Ukraine Peace Talks Be Woven Together?

    Putin is stalling, waiting for a breakthrough on the front lines or a grand bargain in which Trump will give him something more than Ukraine in exchange for concessions on Ukraine. And if that doesn’t happen, the conflict could be expanded beyond Ukraine.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor Moscow

    Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.  

      Ruslan Suleymanov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Will the Loss of Starlink and Telegram Impact Russia’s Military?

    With the blocking of Starlink terminals and restriction of access to Telegram, Russian troops in Ukraine have suffered a double technological blow. But neither service is irreplaceable.

      Maria Kolomychenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.