Commentary
- +1
Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, Andy Robaina, …
{
"authors": [
"Milan Vaishnav"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"South Asia",
"India"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Civil Society"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
New Rules for Indian Politics
There are three clear lessons that can be drawn from India’s 2014 election.
Published on Jun 29, 2015
Source: IDFC
Milan Vaishnav spoke about the 2014 Indian elections at the IDFC Institute in New Delhi. The talk brings together a few of Dr. Vaishnav's current research projects to address whether the recent election was truly a "game changer." He began by laying out the facts of the election, including that it was the largest election in human history and that it is the first time a party other than the Indian National Congress has won such a resounding mandate in India. He noted, optimistically, that while the election was polarized along religious lines, Narendra Modi won in large part due to his successful record as Chief Minister of Gujarat, suggesting that the Indian electorate is rewarding competent governance in a way it has not in the past. In other areas, though, such as the presence of political dynasties in the legislature and the electoral success of criminals, this election was an example of continuity rather than change.Vaishnav pointed to three key takeaways from this election. First, the BJP has supplanted the Congress as the dominant pole around which Indian politics revolves. Second, though identity politics are still important, they are not sufficient to win; politicians must combine identity-based appeals with strong records on economic and governance issues if they are to succeed. Third, though voters may be shifting their preferences and regional parties are proliferating, the nature of the candidates themselves has not changed much.
About the Author
Milan Vaishnav
Director and Senior Fellow, South Asia Program
Milan Vaishnav is a senior fellow and director of the South Asia Program and the host of the Grand Tamasha podcast at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His primary research focus is the political economy of India, and he examines issues such as corruption and governance, state capacity, distributive politics, and electoral behavior. He also conducts research on the Indian diaspora.
- Indian Americans Still Lean Left. Just Not as Reliably.
- Indian Americans in a Time of Turbulence: 2026 Survey ResultsPaper
- +1
Milan Vaishnav, Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced VotingCommentary
The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.
Andrey Pertsev
- Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?Commentary
As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.
Balázs Jarábik
- Where Does the Split in the Ruling Tandem Leave Kyrgyzstan?Commentary
Despite its reputation as an island of democracy in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan appears to be on the brink of becoming a personalist autocracy.
Temur Umarov
- In Uzbekistan, the President’s Daughter Is Now His Second-in-CommandCommentary
Having failed to build a team that he can fully trust or establish strong state institutions, Mirziyoyev has become reliant on his family.
Galiya Ibragimova
- Japan’s “Militarist Turn” and What It Means for RussiaCommentary
For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.
James D.J. Brown
