• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Sarah Yerkes"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Israel",
    "Palestine",
    "Levant"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

50 Voices, 50 Years

Israeli and Palestinian civil society activists keep fighting to close the divide between their societies despite myriad obstacles.

Link Copied
By Sarah Yerkes
Published on May 30, 2017

Source: ADL, BICOM, Fathom Journal

Since the prospects for peace reached a pinnacle during the period shortly after the Oslo Accords, sadly, those prospects have grown dimmer. But since the high point of the peace process, the policies of the past 25 years have steadily widened the physical and psychological chasm between Israelis and Palestinians. Today, even those who live on top of each other – quite literally in some cases – do not know each other and have almost no interaction. As a result, smaller and smaller numbers of Israelis and Palestinians voice support for a two-state solution.  For the first time, the idea of a one-state solution has become part of the normal discourse.

Most troubling, leaders on both sides are increasingly attempting to marginalize and repress local activists fighting for a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Israel has cracked down on human rights NGOs while a chorus of influential Palestinian voices are pushing an “anti-normalization” agenda.

Despite this, Israeli and Palestinian civil society activists keep fighting. It is tempting on this anniversary to look back at the past 50 years in despair, but I retain hope. I do because the youngest generation of Israelis and Palestinians, despite knowing only conflict throughout their lives, is choosing to close the divide between them. Where their parents and grandparents have given up, young people are taking risks to meet each other, and to understand each other and are building the fabric necessary to someday bring about a resolution to a conflict that has lasted far too long.

My hope is that in another 50 years, when these kids are writing their own reflections, the story they tell will be a story of how they finally overcame the myriad factors driving them apart; how they fought against leaders incapable of overcoming their own petty political interests; and how when they reached the pit of despair in 2017, they figured out how to claw their way back to the light.

This article was originally published by the ADL, BICOM, and Fathom Journal. 

About the Author

Sarah Yerkes
Sarah Yerkes

Senior Fellow, Middle East Program

Sarah Yerkes is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Middle East Program, where her research focuses on Tunisia’s political, economic, and security developments as well as state-society relations in the Middle East and North Africa.

    Recent Work

  • Other
    Senegal: An Island of Resilience
      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes, Natalie Triche

  • Article
    Amid Iran War, Gulf Countries Slow the Pace of Reforms
      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes, Amr Hamzawy

Sarah Yerkes
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Sarah Yerkes
Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyMiddle EastIsraelPalestineLevant

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?

    The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.  

      Salavat Abylkalikov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russian Market Sours for Belarusian State Companies

    Minsk’s faith in the future of its larger neighbor’s economy is fading as Belarusian firms in Russia see record losses.    

      Olga Loiko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Did Putin Return From China Empty-Handed?

    With no key agreement signed on the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline, there is a risk that the window of opportunity for Russia will close if Chinese power generation becomes so green that new gas sources are no longer of any interest to Beijing.

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Central Europe’s Post-Orban Russia Policy Look Like?

    Though Orban is gone, Putin can still count on some like-minded individuals in Central and Eastern Europe. However, they will seek to avoid open confrontation with EU institutions over Ukraine and their ties with Moscow.


      Dimitar Bechev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Are Russia-Japan Relations Really Warming Up?

    The truth is that Japan’s government is seeking a degree of reengagement but at a vastly reduced level than under Abe. Most significantly, Japan has shown no willingness to ease sanctions.

      James D.J. Brown

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.