• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Philippe Le Corre"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia",
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Western Europe",
    "Asia",
    "Europe",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Mr Xi’s European Tour Is Response to US-China Rift

The bottom line is that bridging to G7 nations such as Italy and France and getting global recognition for the BRI are now top Chinese priorities. China wants to be seen as the new champion of multilateralism.

Link Copied
By Philippe Le Corre
Published on Mar 18, 2019

Source: Euractiv

The agenda includes a possible meeting with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago and a forum of his signature “Belt and Road” (BRI) in Beijing, where he hopes to host a large number of foreign heads of state and government.

Yet Xi’s upcoming trip to Europe is perhaps the most intriguing of all. The two countries chosen by Beijing, Italy and France, are both founding members of the European Union; they’re  also G7 and NATO members, fairly large economies, and strong allies of the United States. This sets them apart from nations in Eastern or Southern Europe, considered as easy targets for “predatory” China.

Still, as China knows too well, the political and economic realities of Paris and Rome could not be further apart.

Italy is in the middle of a deep recession, run by a complex coalition of populist, headline-grabbing political parties. Rome recently attracted media attention as one of its ruling factions, the Five Star movement, succeeded in getting the government to sign on to Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Although the decision has brought a lot of confusion and could backfire, with possible setbacks from other Western powers, President Xi is expected to finalize a BRI Memorandum of Understanding during his official visit on March 22-23.

Beijing also sees Italy as a priority for its Maritime Silk Road, considered vital to China’s ever-growing wealth maritime strategy, including greater access to Northern European markets. After acquiring a 51% state in the Greek port of Piraeus in 2016, China has bought positions in the ports of Venice and Genoa and is expected to strike a similar deal with the city of Trieste. Italy ranks number three in the EU when it comes to Chinese investment. Meanwhile, Rome runs a €16 billion trade deficit with Beijing.

France, on the other hand, is the current chair of the G7 and is run by the highest-profile leader in Europe. Although France was the first major Western nation to recognize the People’s Republic of China diplomatically in 1964, the bilateral relationship has had occasional setbacks. France hosted student leaders of the 1989 Tiananmen Square movement and then proceeded with arm sales to Taiwan in the 1990s, raising Beijing’s ire.

This will be Jinping’s second trip to France as president: in 2014, he made a state visit to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries. But since his election in 2017, President Emmanuel Macron has adopted a new, less diplomatic rhetoric toward Beijing, especially compared to Rome’s recent approach.

While visiting China in 2018, Macron he suggested that the BRI should not be a “one way road.” Paris has also expressed strong views on freedom of navigation in the South China Sea (which China considers most of it as part of his sovereign territory) and has been pushing for a more restrictive policy vis a vis foreign direct investments (FDI).

Under French (and German) influence, the European Union has just finalized a much-needed EU-wide FDI screening mechanism, giving individual member states a legal framework that they could adopt voluntarily, allowing them to review cases on national security grounds, as well as economic and competition aspects.

Despite all this, with regard to its image and global positioning, China needs France. Both countries are permanent members of the UN Security Council and exert some international influence. France is a key player in Europe. In fields such as technology (including 5G) and the BRI, Beijing has been trying to counter-balance Washington’s hawkish discourse by gathering support across the Atlantic.

For example, four years ago, China received support from the UK, Germany, France, and Italy when these countries decided to join the China-backed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank– against Washington’s view.

China has also tried to rally Eastern and Central European countries through the 16+1 mechanism (including 11 EU member states), a group that meets once a year in the presence of the Chinese prime minister, but with limited concrete results.

The bottom line is that bridging to G7 nations such as Italy and France and getting global recognition for the BRI are now top Chinese priorities. There is little doubt Xi will try to rally support in Paris. Although Macron is highly unlikely to attend the BRI forum in Beijing in April, discussions have been taking place in Paris—as in Rome—about the initiative.

Because Macron appears the most vocal proponent of globalization in Europe, China also wants to be seen as the new champion of multilateralism, and will do its utmost to engage France in particular on subjects such as climate, peacekeeping operations, and global governance.

On the other hand, the French government –like its Italian counterpart- has expressed interest in more Chinese investments, imports and joint-ventures, as well as a better market access in China. Chances that a “win-win” compromise will be found are running high.

Across the Atlantic, perceptions could not be more different within a hawkish U.S. administration generally opposed to a compromise with Beijing.

This article was originally published by Euroactiv.

About the Author

Philippe Le Corre

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Europe Program

Philippe Le Corre was a nonresident senior fellow in the Europe Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Recent Work

  • Q&A
    Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Has Jeopardized the China-EU Relationship

      Paul Haenle, Philippe Le Corre

  • Paper
    China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries
      • +1

      Erik Brattberg, Philippe Le Corre, Paul Stronski, …

Philippe Le Corre
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Europe Program
EconomyTradeForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChinaWestern EuropeAsiaEuropeIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?

    Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Can the Disparate Threads of Ukraine Peace Talks Be Woven Together?

    Putin is stalling, waiting for a breakthrough on the front lines or a grand bargain in which Trump will give him something more than Ukraine in exchange for concessions on Ukraine. And if that doesn’t happen, the conflict could be expanded beyond Ukraine.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor Moscow

    Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.  

      Ruslan Suleymanov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Signs of an Imminent End to the Ukraine War Are Deceptive

    The main source of Russian aggression is a profound mistrust of the West and the firm belief that it intends to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia. As long as this fear persists, the war will not end.

      Tatiana Stanovaya

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Does Russia Have Enough Soldiers to Keep Waging War Against Ukraine?

    The Russian army is not currently struggling to recruit new contract soldiers, though the number of people willing to go to war for money is dwindling.

      Dmitry Kuznets

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.