{
"authors": [
"Nancy Birdsall",
"Brian Deese"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": []
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Source: Carnegie
"On the Multilateral Development Banks in a Changing Global Economy"
Economic Perspectives Electronic Journal of the U.S. Department of State, Vol. 6, No. 1, February 2001
Nancy Birdsall and Brian Deese
Despite quantum increases in private capital flows to developing and emerging-market countries, there are still good reasons for the multilateral development banks (MDB) to continue their activities in these countries. The new private flows -- mostly to middle-income developing countries -- are highly susceptible to reversal, and, in difficult times, the private loans may be unavailable or too costly. MDB financing plays a valuable counter-cyclical role in these economies, and MDB lending can help "crowd in" private investment, signaling a country's commitment to reform.
Nonetheless, the MDBs need to adapt their policies to the changing demands of their members. MDB pricing should become more product and country specific, and new products should be designed to better deal with emergencies and non-lending services. The MDBs should take advantage of the HIPC initiative as a chance to become more selective in their lending practices, and should re-juggle representation within their institutional structures to better reflect changing realities.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
In return for a trade deal and the release of political prisoners, the United States has lifted sanctions on Belarus, breaking the previous Western policy consensus. Should Europeans follow suit, using their leverage to extract concessions from Lukashenko, or continue to isolate a key Kremlin ally?
Thomas de Waal, ed.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán faces his most serious challenge yet in the April 2026 parliamentary elections. All of Europe should monitor the Fidesz campaign: It will use unprecedented methods of electoral manipulation to secure victory and maintain power.
Zsuzsanna Szelényi
As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.
Dinakar Peri
Carnegie scholars examine the crucial elements of a document that’s radically different than its predecessors.
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
The hyper-personalized new version of global sphere-of-influence politics that Donald Trump wants will fail, as it did for Russia. In the meantime, Europe must still deal with a disruptive former ally determined to break the rules.
Thomas de Waal