As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.
Dinakar Peri
{
"authors": [
"Matt Ferchen"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China and the Developing World",
"China’s Foreign Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}China’s domestic development drive has prompted it to develop trade relations with Latin America. While generating positive economic results for both sides in the short-term, the threat of Latin America once again falling into a pattern of export dependency—this time with China—looms large.
Source: Chinese Journal of International Politics

In his article ‘China-Latin America Relations: Long-Term Boon or Short-Term Boom?’, Dr. Matt Ferchen pinpoints the resultant dual narratives, some describing the China–Latin America relationship as complementary and others emphasizing dependency. The author demonstrates, however, that no assessment of the health and stability of the China–Latin America relationship can be complete without better understanding of Chinese commodity demand. Chinese demand for key Latin American commodities, including mineral resources such as iron ore, is based on a boom in domestic Chinese heavy industrial production, which in turn has fueled a global commodity boom of inputs to feed it. Chinese industrial (over)production has increased only as a result of stimulus and credit policies in the wake of the global financial crisis, causing concern inside and outside of China about capacity and asset bubbles.
The basis of China–Latin America trade and investment relations, therefore, the author emphasizes, is both narrower and more fragile than commonly understood. To align overly optimistic expectations about the health and sustainability of China–Latin America relations, both sides need to assess more realistically the many challenges to maintaining the boom in economic relations of the last decade.
This article was originally published in the Chinese Journal of International Politics.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.
Dinakar Peri
Beset by an increasingly hostile United States, internal divisions, and the threat of Russian aggression, the EU finds itself in a make-or-break moment. U.S. President Donald Trump calls it a decaying group of nations headed by weak leaders. Is Europe able to prove him wrong?
Thomas de Waal
Hard-line approaches to asylum policy are increasingly common, with crackdowns proposed even by parties that traditionally hold liberal views on migration. Does this shift represent a break with Europe’s fundamental values?
Thomas de Waal
The second Trump administration has shifted the cornerstones of the liberal international order. How the EU responds will determine not only its global standing but also the very integrity of the European project.
Rym Momtaz
The rift between Brussels and Washington raises questions about which side will emerge stronger. The Europeans are laying the groundwork to enhance their power and have already proved their ability to withstand epochal change.
Erik Jones