{
"authors": [
"Amal Saad-Ghorayeb"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iran",
"Israel",
"Lebanon"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Saad-Ghorayeb, a Lebanese political analyst writing from Beirut, draws on interviews she carried out with Hizbollah officials both before and after the outbreak of fighting in mid-July to provide vital insights into the causes and consequences of the war with Israel.
Source: Carnegie Endowment
To read this Policy Outlook in Arabic, please visit Carnegie's Arabic portal.
Part One: Motives, Strategy and Objectives
As the international community scrambles to resolve the current crisis in Lebanon, the motives and objectives of Hizbollah and Israel remain unclear. How did the conflict escalate so quickly? What do both parties hope to gain? With diplomatic efforts to achieve a resolution of the fighting between Israel and Hizbollah in a critical phase, understanding Hizbollah’s outlook and intentions is crucial.
In a new Policy Outlook, Hizbollah’s Outlook in the Current Conflict (Part One): Motives, Strategy, and Objectives, Amal Saad-Ghorayeb provides vital insights. Saad-Ghorayeb, a Lebanese political analyst writing from Beirut, draws on interviews she carried out with Hizbollah officials both before and after the outbreak of fighting in mid-July.
Some of the author’s main findings are:
• Hizbollah’s July 12 attack on an Israeli convoy was intended to provoke a prisoner exchange; it was not an Iranian-directed effort to trigger a wider conflict.
• Although prepared for it, Hizbollah did not expect a massive Israeli counter-strike.
• Hizbollah perceives Washington as the engineer of Israel’s current offensive and now views itself as in direct confrontation with the overall U.S. agenda for the region.
• Hizbollah aims to compromise the perception of Israeli military supremacy in the region, with the hope of undermining the stability of Israel itself.
This is a web-only publication.
Click on the link above for the full text of this Carnegie publication.
Part Two: Accommodating Diplomacy and Preparing for the Post-War Context
The adoption of UN Resolution 1701 represents to many Lebanese citizens the possibility of a return to normal life, but doubts abound about the possibility of a lasting peace. Israeli forces remain in Lebanon for now but Hizbollah is unwilling to tolerate their presence and has yet shown no signs of willingness to disarm. What is the likelihood Hizbollah will disarm as the peace process unfolds? What is Hizbollah’s post-conflict agenda? How will the outcome of this war change Hizbollah, domestically and internationally?
A second Carnegie Policy Outlook by Lebanese researcher Amal Saad-Ghorayeb writing from Beirut, Hizbollah’s Outlook in the Current Conflict (Part Two): Accommodating Diplomacy and Preparing for the Post-War Context, offers answers to these questions.
Some of the author’s main findings are:
• Prospects for the cessation of hostilities are very poor during the period immediately ahead; until UN peacekeepers and Lebanese army forces arrive, Israel and Hizbollah will still be face to face.
• The postponement of yesterday’s special Lebanese cabinet meeting over the issue of Hizbollah’s disarmament is a troubling sign of potential future conflict.
• Hizbollah’s view of itself as the winner against the Israeli Defense Forces has only hardened its position concerning disarmament. If the Lebanese government pushes too hard for Hizbollah’s disarmament, the result could be the collapse of the government or worse, civil conflict.
This is a web-only publication.
Click on the link above for the full text of this Carnegie publication.
About the Author
Amal Saad-Ghorayeb is an assistant professor at the Lebanese American University. She is author of Hizbullah: Politics and Religion (Pluto Press, 2002). She lives in Beirut.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.
Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha
A prophetic Romanian novel about a town at the mouth of the Danube carries a warning: Europe decays when it stops looking outward. In a world of increasing insularity, the EU should heed its warning.
Thomas de Waal
The EU’s engagement with the rest of the world has become increasingly uneven. To chase the ambition of a global Europe, the second von der Leyen commission must leverage funds and diplomatic tools to play a more cohesive role in shaping international affairs.
Francesco Siccardi
As the 2026 Armenian election approaches, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is facing fierce opposition from both Russia and the diaspora. He will need the help of Europe, the United States, and regional neighbours to advance his ambitious foreign policy.
Thomas de Waal
Despite holding significant leverage, the EU remains sidelined in ongoing diplomacy around the Gaza peace plan. How can the union overcome internal divisions to take a more active role?
Rym Momtaz