Research
- +6
Yasmine Farouk, Nathan J. Brown, Maysaa Shuja Al-Deen, …
{
"authors": [
"Michele Dunne"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Palestine",
"Levant"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Let Fatah Talk to Hamas
The Gaza flotilla incident highlights not only the unsustainability of the closure of Gaza, but also the unsustainability of the U.S. position discouraging reconciliation between the Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas.
Published on Jun 1, 2010
Source: The New York Times
The United States says it favors a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and institution building for a Palestinian state, but those outcomes will require unified Palestinian leadership that enjoys adequate support in both the West Bank and Gaza.
President Mahmoud Abbas cannot take risks in negotiations with Israel partly because his mandate is so slim; he exerts control over only fragments of the West Bank and none of Gaza and he is also long past the end of his electoral term.
The suspension of the elected Palestinian Legislative Council since the 2007 rift between Fatah and Hamas also makes institution building difficult. How can the Palestinian Authority undertake sustainable reforms when it cannot legislate? And meanwhile, Gaza has been drifting off in its own dangerously separate direction under Hamas leadership.
For the past 20 years, the United States has sought one short-term Israeli-Palestinian negotiating breakthrough after another — few of which have yielded real or lasting progress — while working to postpone, frustrate, or manipulate internal Palestinian politics in order to serve the negotiations.
The United States need not engage Hamas directly while the group continues to advocate armed struggle against Israel. But it is time for the United States to tolerate the internal Palestinian political competition and bargaining that will be necessary to reunite the West Bank and Gaza and to support real institution building for a future state.
The United States should stop impeding reconciliation efforts such as those recently exerted by Egypt, cease providing excuses to the Ramallah leadership for avoiding compromise, and signal its willingness to tolerate a modus vivendi between Fatah and Hamas as well as Palestinian elections.
The Obama administration should look for ways to continue cooperation with and assistance to a Palestinian Authority that includes Hamas, as long as that Authority is willing to prevent terrorism and allow the P.L.O. to negotiate with Israel.
About the Author
Michele Dunne
Former Nonresident Scholar, Middle East Program
Michele Dunne was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s Middle East Program, where her research focuses on political and economic change in Arab countries, particularly Egypt, as well as U.S. policy in the Middle East.
- Islamic Institutions in Arab States: Mapping the Dynamics of Control, Co-option, and Contention
- From Hardware to Holism: Rebalancing America’s Security Engagement With Arab StatesResearch
- +8
Robert Springborg, Emile Hokayem, Becca Wasser, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?Commentary
Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing ItCommentary
Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.
Rym Momtaz
- Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good ReasonsCommentary
The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.
Marc Pierini
- Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of ConnectivityArticle
The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.
Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.
