• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil has managed to thrive in an industry fraught with risk and to thwart those who might oppose its interests at nearly every turn.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on May 29, 2012

Source: El País

ExxonMobil -- with revenues of about $450 billion (yes, $450 billion) – displaced WalMart as the world’s largest company. Most countries do not have annual incomes of that magnitude. Steve Coll, an elegant writer and dogged investigative reporter just published a book on which he had been working for years: Private Empire. The book shows how in the 1990s, ExxonMobil – which already was a huge company – laid the foundations that enabled it to becoming the dominant giant that it now is.

Coll specializes in prying open closed institutions. His two previous books scrutinized the conduct of the CIA in Afghanistan, and the Bin Laden family. “Reporting on Exxon was not only more difficult than reporting on the Bin Ladens, it was harder than reporting on the CIA,” he says. “They have a culture of intimidation […]; they make people nervous and afraid.” Exxon Mobil has met its match in a tenacious, intelligent reporter who isn’t easily scared. Coll traveled the world, met more than 400 people, obtained secret documents and seems to have read everything available in libraries, archives, courts and news media on the company and the institutions with which it interacts. This effort has produced a thriller-like story that reveals a fascinating interplay of power, money and politics at the highest international levels, where the stakes are stratospheric.

The essence of the story is that the business of ExxonMobil – the finding, extraction and sale of oil and gas – is hugely expensive and risky. It requires immense investments that bear fruit only in the long term. “Exxon’s investments in a particular oil field could be premised on a production life span of 40 or more years,” Coll writes. “During that time the United States might change its president and its foreign and energy policies at least half a dozen times. Overseas it is even worse: coups d’état, revolutions and violence cause more frequent and drastic changes. Its enormous expenditures and long recovery period make its investments highly vulnerable to such volatility.”

In the heady 1990s the world market was transformed. After the fall of the Soviet Union, many previously closed countries opened their doors to foreign investment. Asia, and China and India in particular, began an upsurge that spurred on the global economy. At the same time, the world became aware of the environmental damage produced by fossil fuels, while terrorism and wars proliferated alongside all sorts of political and financial convulsions.

How can a powerful company elude and control this volatility, and even profit from it? ExxonMobil did so, and with great success, in the hands of a charismatic leader, Lee “Iron Ass” Raymond, the CEO who led the company from 1993 to 2005. The book documents the exceptional capacities this firm developed for minimizing the impact of changing times, and in blocking initiatives by governments, rival firms and organizations that threatened its interests.

The oil giant has, for example, been very effective in limiting the success of the scientists and activists who are fighting to diminish the carbon emissions that cause global warming. It has contended with guerrillas in Indonesia; with Arab sheikhs and with strongmen like Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chávez and Teodoro Obiang. But above all, it knows how to handle the US government, especially its Congress.

“The corporation’s lobbyists bent and shaped American foreign policy,” writes Coll, “as well as economic, climate, chemical and environmental regulations.” As the company internationalized, its links with the US got weaker. “Exxon’s far-flung interests were at times different from Washington’s. Raymond did not manage the corporation as a subordinate instrument of US foreign policy; his was a private empire.” Raymond himself put it more bluntly: “I am not a US company, and I don’t make decisions based on what is good for the US.” “Compromise was not Exxon’s way,” Coll wryly remarks at one point.

In an interview, Coll offers one of his most revealing opinions: “ExxonMobil does follow the law, I think. I’m really persuaded that they always stay inside the lines.” Though he doesn’t say it in so many words, his book shows how easy it can be for a company to stay inside the lines, when it draws them itself.

This article originally appeared in El País.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyClimate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in Ukraine

    The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Greenland United States Denmark Agreement Nuuk
    Commentary
    The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of Time

    The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.

      Marc Pierini

  • Ukraine Russia Black Sea Food
    Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    A Black Sea Truce Is About Global Food Security, Too

    A summer of escalation in the Black Sea has hurt Ukraine economically and is exacerbating world food security. A truce is needed—as is a broader reframing of Europe’s Ukraine strategy.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Speech Ursula von der Leyen Can’t Deliver

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is about to give her annual address on the state of the EU. Here’s what she won’t—but should—say.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Le Pen France Far Right
    Article
    How Europe’s 2027 Elections Could Test EU Governance

    Radical-right parties are expected to do well in upcoming elections in four of the EU's biggest member states. If successful, they could prevent the union from addressing key challenges ahead.

      Stefan Lehne

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.