In The Media
Petr Topychkanov
{
"authors": [
"Petr Topychkanov"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Civil Society"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Pogroms
Last weekend, two districts of Moscow became a battlefield between the police and the people described as nationalists by mass media or as hooligans by the authorities. Moscow has been a place of pogroms many times, but this time the authorities were more efficient than in previous cases.
Published on Oct 18, 2013
Last weekend, two districts of Moscow became a battlefield between the police and the people described as nationalists by mass media or as hooligans by the authorities. The pretext was a murder of a Muscovite by a person of a South Caucasus origin. The Ministry of Internal Affairs launched an operation Vulcan to prevent proliferation of the riots and detain suspect organizers and activists of those events. Over 200 people were arrested. About a dozen police were injured.
Moscow has been a place of pogroms many times, including several incidences after the Soviet Union collapse. It seems that last weekend the authorities were more efficient than in previous cases, yet still not enough. The question is, how efficient they can be?
According to several studies of the mass violence phenomenon worldwide, the first wave of pogroms is often missed by the law enforcement agencies, despite their awareness of a high probability of pogroms. It can be explained in two ways. On the one hand, these agencies need some time to assess probability and possible scale of pogroms in order to deploy an appropriate number of troops.
On another hand, the agencies can actually let rioters initiate pogroms attempting to achieve two goals. One of them is the canalization of feelings of disobedience of people. The second goal may be to exert pressure on some communities which become the target of such pogroms.
Anyway, the perception of a pogrom as chaos does not reflect the reality. According to Natalie Zemon Davis, “Even in the extreme case of religious violence, crowds do not act in a mindless way”. This can be witnessed in many incidences. For instance, Ian Talbot in his study of The 1947 Violence in Punjab demonstrated the existence of an organized effort behind the mass violence and a certain structure to support it.
What we can do if the pogrom is not totally unavoidable? I absolutely agree with doctor Davis, who argues that if we want to secure trust and ensure safety in society and to guarantee that the violence it generates will take the least cruel of forms, then we must think more about changing the central values of the society to emphasize tolerance and the use of non-violent ways of conflict resolution.
About the Author
Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.
- Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System
- Premonition of Nuclear ThreatIn The Media
Petr Topychkanov
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of ConnectivityArticle
The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.
Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev
- Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic OpportunityCommentary
The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.
William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk
- Is the Radical-Right Threat Existential or Overstated?Commentary
Amid increased polarization and the influence of disinformation, radical-right parties are once again gaining traction across Europe. With landmark elections on the horizon in several countries, are the EU’s geostrategic vision and fundamental values under existential threat?
Catherine Fieschi, Cas Mudde
- Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?Commentary
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
