Commentary
- +1
Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, Andy Robaina, …
{
"authors": [
"Milan Vaishnav"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [
"India Decides 2014"
],
"regions": [
"South Asia",
"India"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Democracy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
‘NOTA Is Not the Same as Right to Reject’
It remains to be seen whether negative voting will influence the quality of politicians in Indian elections.
Published on Dec 2, 2013
Source: Deutsche Welle
India is currently holding key polls in five states - Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Rajasthan, and Mizoram. For the first time, voters have the option of rejecting all the candidates standing in the elections by choosing the "none of the above" or NOTA option.
Many hoped the provision, which was introduced after Supreme Court ruling, would lead to the parties fielding to “better” candidates to the polls. However, political analyst Milan Vaishnav says in a DW interview that NOTA has had zero impact on the quality of politicians selected for the current state elections.DW: What were the main reasons behind the introduction of NOTA to Indian elections?
Milan Vaishnav: One of the principal motives behind this provision was to allow voters to exercise the right to participate in the electoral process without feeling compelled to vote for a candidate or party they do not support, for lack of an alternative option. It affords each and every voter the right to register his or her "negative vote" against all candidates standing for election in a particular constituency.
What is this provision intended to achieve?
NOTA is not the same as "right-to-reject" system, whereby, if the majority of voters opt for "none of the above" option, no candidate will be declared the winner and a fresh election will be called.
Under the system introduced in India, even if the NOTA wins more votes than the candidates running for office, the contestant with the greatest number of votes will still be counted as the victor. In this way, this provision is a disappointment to many good government campaigners as it will not have a substantial impact on "cleaning up" political outcomes.
Some activists say they hope the Supreme Court decision is a first step toward establishing a broader "right-to-reject." Do you believe this could lead to a new provision in India?
It is hard to predict whether there will be a "right-to-reject" in the future. However, the Supreme Court's recent ruling certainly increases the possibility this will happen. NOTA is only a half-step in that direction.
Given the way in which the Court has tried to fill a governance vacuum in India - one that was created by parliament and politicians - it seems likely that civil society will keep up the pressure. If India's politicians do not take electoral reforms seriously, the judges may be under some pressure to take matters into their own hands.
Has NOTA led to the political parties choosing candidates with a clean image in the ongoing state elections?
It has had zero impact on the quality of politicians selected by parties for these state elections. In fact, in several states we see that the number of candidates with criminal records is higher in 2013 than it was in the past election in 2008.
In the state of Rajasthan, an analysis by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has shown that 15 percent of major party candidates in 2008 faced criminal cases; in 2013, the number remains 15 percent. However, the number of candidates with "serious" cases has gone up in 2013. The trend is similar in other states such as Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.
How important are these state elections and why?
They are important for two main reasons. First, when state elections occur less than two years before national elections, the verdicts are typically the same. That is, the parties winning the majority of seats at the state level usually end up repeating the feat at the national level.
Second, although the contest will be determined largely by local factors, there is no doubt that the election outcomes will be interpreted as referenda on the two leading prime ministerial candidates, Rahul Gandhi of the ruling Congress Party and Narendra Modi of the opposition BJP.
What impact will NOTA have on the voter turnout in the elections?
It might only have a small impact. For starters, many voters are not aware of the option. There hasn't been much time for authorities and civic activists to inform nearly 800 million Indian voters. However, to the extent voters do become informed, it might help increase the turnout in the upcoming national elections. Now there is a mechanism for conscientious voters to participate even if they are turned off by the individual candidates standing for election. NOTA is their own personal form of protest.
About the Author
Milan Vaishnav
Director and Senior Fellow, South Asia Program
Milan Vaishnav is a senior fellow and director of the South Asia Program and the host of the Grand Tamasha podcast at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His primary research focus is the political economy of India, and he examines issues such as corruption and governance, state capacity, distributive politics, and electoral behavior. He also conducts research on the Indian diaspora.
- Indian Americans Still Lean Left. Just Not as Reliably.
- Indian Americans in a Time of Turbulence: 2026 Survey ResultsPaper
- +1
Milan Vaishnav, Sumitra Badrinathan, Devesh Kapur, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Is the Radical-Right Threat Existential or Overstated?Commentary
Amid increased polarization and the influence of disinformation, radical-right parties are once again gaining traction across Europe. With landmark elections on the horizon in several countries, are the EU’s geostrategic vision and fundamental values under existential threat?
Catherine Fieschi, Cas Mudde
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- New Approaches to Defending Global Civil SocietyResearch
New thinking is needed on how global civil society can be protected. In an era of major-power rivalry, competitive geopolitics, and security primacy, civil society is in danger of getting squeezed – in some countries, almost entirely out of existence.
Richard Youngs, ed., Elene Panchulidze, ed.
- How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor TransitionCommentary
Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.
Amanda Coakley
- Can Europe Still Matter in Syria?Commentary
Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.
Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha
