C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah
{
"authors": [
"C. Raja Mohan"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie India"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"South Asia",
"India"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Why PM Narendra Modi's Invite to Obama Marks a Watershed in India-U.S. Ties
Modi’s decision to invite Obama to India, and the American president’s acceptance, reveal the mutual understanding level between two leaders.
Source: Indian Express
The presence of US President Barack Obama at the Republic Day celebrations next year is likely to mark the long-awaited moment of transformation in India’s relations with America and an extraordinary shift in Delhi’s world view.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decision to invite Obama, and the American president’s acceptance reveal the scale and scope of the mutual understanding that appears to have emerged out of the meeting between the two leaders in September.
Over the next two months, Delhi and Washington will have the opportunity to clinch a broad set of ambitious agreements — ranging from defence and counter-terrorism at one end to economic agreements at the other — that will lay the foundation for a genuine strategic partnership between India and the United States.That this is the first time Delhi has invited an American president to join the Republic Day celebrations highlights enduring Indian ambivalence towards the United States.
The reluctance of the world’s largest democracy to share the most important day in its national life with the world’s most powerful democracy underlined how estranged the two republics had become over the decades. It was indeed commonplace to suggest that anti-Americanism was deeply embedded within the DNA of the Indian political and bureaucratic classes.
This jinx has now been broken by an Indian Prime Minister who has had the greatest reason to turn his back on America; for Washington had denied him entry into the United States for more than a decade.
Unlike many in Delhi, who were advising the PM to ignore America, Modi has understood the centrality of the United States in accelerating India’s economic growth and elevating its position in the international system.
Whatever might have been his personal grievance, Modi said, it has no bearing on on his government’s pursuit of India’s national interests with the United States.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, India’s first prime minister from the BJP, saw far enough to declare in 1998 that India and America were ‘natural allies’ despite the then prevailing tensions over the nuclear issue. Modi now appears determined to translate Vajpayee’s sentiment into a durable partnership.
Obama, too, moved quickly to seize the moment when Modi won the elections in May. Recognizing the mistakes made on the visa issue, Obama chose to call Modi even before he was sworn in as the PM and invite him to Washington.
When he shows up in Delhi in January, Obama will be the only American president to visit India twice. Obama had visited India in November 2010.
Contrary to the widespread perception that Obama’s warm reception to Modi at the White House was just a photo op, the two leaders appeared to have decided to resolve all outstanding issues — from trade and climate change to nuclear liability and nonproliferation — and clear the path for new and consequential initiatives.
The recent deal on WTO that came out of the intense negotiations that followed Modi’s visit to the White House suggests that the two leaders had personally driven their bureaucracies to bring the dispute on trade facilitation to an end.
That the news of the invitation to Obama came first from Modi’s personal twitter handle and not from either the Prime Minister’s Office or the Ministry of External Affairs, reveals the extraordinary personal attention that PM has devoted to the relationship with America.
The latest development takes us back to 2005-06, when Bush offered a rare opportunity to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to transform the partnership between the two countries. But self-doubt in the Congress leadership and opportunistic opposition from the BJP saw India squander that rare moment.
With stronger authority over his own party and government and a clear vision of India’s international goals, Modi is all set to pick up the ball that was dropped by the UPA government a decade ago.
Although many in Delhi say Obama is a lame-duck president, Modi knows that the American President has considerable freedom to conduct foreign policy until the very last day in office and has immense executive power to effect change the relations with India.
Strong Republican support for India in the US Congress, the new tensions in America’s ties with China and Russia, and the unfolding geopolitical flux in Middle East and Asia, make it possible for Modi and Obama to boldly reimagine the bilateral partnership.
This article was originally published in the Indian Express.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.
- Deepening the India-France Maritime PartnershipArticle
- Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New DelhiCommentary
- +1
Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?Commentary
Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing ItCommentary
Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.
Rym Momtaz
- Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good ReasonsCommentary
The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.
Marc Pierini
- Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of ConnectivityArticle
The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.
Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.