Raphaël Lefèvre
{
"authors": [
"Raphaël Lefèvre"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Levant",
"Lebanon",
"Syria",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security"
]
}Source: Getty
The Muslim Brotherhood's Role in Syria
The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood had been in exile for a long time, so it had to work very hard to gain a measure of influence on the Syrian uprisings.
Source: Project on Middle East Political Science
Speaking with George Washington University’s Marc Lynch, director of the Project on Middle East Political Science, Carnegie’s Raphaël Lefèvre discussed the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, the Syrian civil war, and Lebanon. When asked about the role the Muslim Brotherhood played in the Syrian uprising, Lefèvre explained that the group had been in exile for a long time, so it had to work very hard to gain a measure of influence on the Syrian uprisings.
It did so through various different ways, continued Lefèvre: “At first, it took a leading role in the Syrian opposition—first the Syrian National Council and then the National Coalition. It tried to do some work on-the-ground inside Syria in rebel-held areas, doing some humanitarian work. It started a series of militias as well, trying to gain influence on the Syrian rebel scene, but that was, unfortunately for them, very unsuccessful because at that point in time...the extremists in Syria were on the rise and posed a serious challenge to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.”
This interview was originally published by the Project on Middle East Political Science (POMEPS).
About the Author
Former Nonresident Scholar, Middle East Center
Raphaël Lefèvre was a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Middle East Center, where his research focuses on Sunni Islamist movements in Lebanon.
- The Sociopolitical Undercurrent of Lebanon’s Salafi MilitancyPaper
- Man of the Moment?Commentary
Raphaël Lefèvre
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against EuropeCommentary
Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.
Maksym Beznosiuk
- Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?Commentary
Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European OrderReport
As the EU confronts profound challenges, several leaders have called for fundamental reform to the union’s model—but only modest, superficial changes have resulted. What if Europe really could be reimagined from zero today: What should such a redesigned European order look like?
Richard Youngs, ed.
- How NATO Became Anchored in the Black SeaCommentary
As Russia's war on Ukraine drags on, NATO is expanding its footprint in the Black Sea. Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria are upgrading their fleets and deepening trilateral cooperation.
Dimitar Bechev
- Managing Montreux: Turkey and the Russia-Ukraine War in the Black SeaArticle
For ninety years, Turkey has been positioned as the principal gatekeeper of Black Sea security. As a result, European and NATO efforts to support Ukraine will require closer engagement with Ankara.
Thomas de Waal