{
"authors": [
"David Livingston",
"Clark Miller",
"Kate Gordon",
"Lindene Patton",
"Nancy Colleton"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SCP",
"programs": [
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Climate Change"
]
}
Source: Getty
A discussion of how business can incorporate climate risks assessments and resiliency into its planning and investments in its supply chain, workforce, and infrastructure.
Source: Security and Sustainability Forum
SSF and Arizona State University’s Global Security Initiative had their fourth webinar in the five-part series on Global Climate Security. This webinar examined how business is valuing climate impacts. To view the earlier webinar videos, go to the Security and Sustainability Forum archives.
Independent of government planning and preparedness for resiliency, business has decisions to make in terms of infrastructure and supply chain dependability. The first is a local issue, but the second is a global one, especially for international companies. Concerns are likely different depending on location and the inputs to development of goods and services. The webinar focused on how business can incorporate climate risks assessments and resiliency into its planning and investments in its supply chain, workforce and infrastructure.
This webinar was originally hosted by the Security and Sustainability Forum.
Former Associate Fellow, Energy and Climate Program
Livingston was an associate fellow in Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where his research focuses on emerging markets, technologies, and risks.
Clark Miller
Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie California
Kate Gordon is a nonresident scholar at Carnegie California.
Lindene Patton
Nancy Colleton
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has twice inspired praise for standing up to U.S. President Donald Trump: at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos and on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. Is Carney showing a third way better than the EU has in dealing with the Trump administration?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
European states control several Overseas Countries and Territories around the world that carry strategic, economic, and environmental weight. As great powers challenge the rules-based order, defending them is a geopolitical imperative for Europe.
Marc Pierini
In supporting Europe’s far-right, MAGA and Russia both want the same thing: a weaker EU. Europe must defend itself without abandoning the openness these forces exploit.
Armida van Rij
As we close out another season of Strategic Europe, it is worth taking stock of the deep shifts underway.
Rym Momtaz
The hybrid warfare landscape is evolving rapidly, leaving policymakers without clear strategies. To better inform their work in addressing emerging challenges, governments must dig deeper into the underlying dynamics at play.
Raluca Csernatoni, Alicia Wanless