Deborah Gordon, Stephen D. Ziman
{
"authors": [
"Deborah Gordon"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SCP",
"programs": [
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [
"Carnegie Oil Initiative"
],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Climate Change"
]
}Source: Getty
Three Ways to Clean Up California’s Oil Production
Policymakers have been focusing on long-term goals to wean California from oil, but here are three smart strategies to seriously shrink the petroleum sector’s climate impacts.
Source: Sacramento Bee
With the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, Gov. Jerry Brown is trying to make meaningful progress at the climate conference in Bonn, Germany, as special adviser for states and regions.
Back home, California – the state with the second highest greenhouse gas emissions – has a real opportunity to reduce hefty emissions from oil production. While policymakers have been focusing on long-term goals to wean the state from oil, they have mostly missed smart strategies to seriously shrink the petroleum sector’s climate impacts.
Strategy 1: Use solar energy to generate steam.
California has the heaviest oil in the United States, which means it contains a lot of carbon and is so thick it does not readily flow to the surface. So companies inject significant volumes of steam underground to melt and lift it out. Natural gas is typically used to heat water into steam. This is where concentrated solar steam comes in. It has been tested in California, is being installed in Oman and appears ready for prime time. Solar can provide up to 80 percent of an oil field’s steam needs.
Strategy 2: Create a state library of chemical analysis of oil.
The composition of oil is changing. California imports two-thirds of the oil it refines. In-state oil is some of the oldest in production nationwide. And studies show that as oil ages, its greenhouse gas emissions increase. The state Division of Oil, Gas & Thermal Resources keeps electronic records of California oil fields, but there is no library of the chemical analysis of oil produced.
Strategy 3: Rethink refining.
There are 19 refineries in the state, and the largest are located along the coast. These refineries are equipped to handle California’s heavy oils, but they have a dirty little secret. To turn heavy oils into gasoline and diesel, refineries leave behind a solid residue known as petroleum coke. Petcoke, especially when it’s high in sulfur and heavy metals, is much too dirty to burn in California and elsewhere in the U.S. Instead, this highly-polluting coal substitute is generally exported to Asia.
California is well-positioned to stop producing petcoke altogether or to find a safe use that doesn’t involve burning. One promising option is greater use of refining techniques that add hydrogen, which dovetails well with California’s hydrogen transportation initiative.
It has been 130 years since California first tapped its highly complex oil. While technology has evolved to keep these depleted fields producing, it is taking more energy and generating more emissions to do so. As the state reduces oil demand with electric vehicles, automation and other strategies, it will be equally important to make oil production cleaner to keep California leading the charge against climate change.
This article was originally published in the Sacramento Bee.
About the Author
Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program
Gordon was director of Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where her research focuses on oil and climate change issues in North America and globally.
- Petroleum Companies Need a Credible Climate PlanArticle
- Advancing Public Climate Engineering DisclosureArticle
Deborah Gordon, Smriti Kumble, David Livingston
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?Commentary
Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing ItCommentary
Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.
Rym Momtaz
- Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good ReasonsCommentary
The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.
Marc Pierini
- Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of ConnectivityArticle
The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.
Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.