• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUNATO
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Paul Stronski"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Central Asia",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

China and Russia’s Uneasy Partnership in Central Asia

China and Russia have grown increasingly close over the past decade, but the imbalance of power between Beijing and Moscow is increasing. Although their partnership in Central Asia is stable for now, Chinese economic, political, and soft power is shifting the geopolitical landscape.

Link Copied
By Paul Stronski
Published on Mar 29, 2018

Source: East Asia Forum

Bound by common resentment towards the overwhelming power of the West, China and Russia have grown increasingly close over the past decade. They enjoy compatible economies—Russia supplies hydrocarbons and other resources that fuel Chinese industry. They push back at the promotion of Western democracy and human rights, seeing them as threats to internal stability.  Both seek to limit the presence of the West, particularly any Western military activity, in their immediate backyards—Eastern Europe for Russia, the South China Sea for China and Central Asia for both.  

After Russia’s rift with the West over Ukraine, isolation pushed Moscow even closer to Beijing. But their relationship is marked by historic insecurity and mistrust that only deepens as the imbalance of power between Beijing and Moscow grows. This dynamic is particularly seen in Central Asia, where Chinese economic, political and soft power is shifting the geopolitical landscape.   

Chinese trade with the five Central Asian states ballooned over the past decade, exceeding US$30 billion in 2016, a figure that dwarfs Russia’s US$18 billion. Despite the hype about a new ‘great game’ between Russia and Europe in Eurasia, it was China—not the West — that broke Russia’s monopoly over Central Asia’s oil and gas exports. China’s clout continues to grow with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), President Xi Jinping’s vast vision to build transportation infrastructure across Eurasia to support his country’s export flows. BRI is a highly ambitious scheme,  albeit one with lingering questions over its economic viability. Even if partially fulfilled, it will reduce Russia’s hold over Central Asia’s export routes.  

Central Asian leaders warmly embrace the BRI, hoping it will jumpstart stagnating economies, enhance socioeconomic stability and bring an influx of follow-on investment. Kazakhstan stands to benefit most from BRI given its geographic location as the key transit state. It welcomes China’s engagement as a way to help modernise ageing infrastructure and diversify its economy. It is also using growing Chinese investment to signal to Russia that it has options and that any attempt by the Kremlin to replicate a Ukraine scenario in Kazakhstan, a country with a large ethnic Russian population, could not go ahead without running into China. 

Russia seems unconcerned about China’s economic dominance of Central Asia or regional leaders’ embrace of Beijing. Moscow knows it can do little about China’s presence. Russia’s stagnant economy limits its ability to compete with China. And Russia’s growing economic and diplomatic dependence on Beijing in the post-Ukraine sanctions era limits Moscow's ability to push back. 

Unlike former US president Barack Obama, who famously dismissed Russia as a ‘regional’ power, President Xi recognises Russian President Vladimir Putin’s desire to be taken seriously as a global leader. To keep public frictions to a minimum, Xi offers Putin multiple summits per year. Often they end with vague promises to coordinate BRI with Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union initiative  (EEU).

But these promises are unlikely to be realised because the BRI and EEU are incompatible. BRI is a vision to connect multiple markets and reorient global trade with China as its engine. The EEU is an effort to create a single closed market that is dominated by Russia to enhance Moscow’s influence in the region in the face of continued encroachments from both Europe and China. With limited resources and a heavy political hand in the region, Russia is a much less attractive option than China. Compared to Beijing’s inclusive BRI framework, the EEU is an unhappy union of coerced members and frequent trade spats. 

Aware of Russian sensitivities about China’s growing power, Beijing smartly refrains from voicing any plans to develop a hard security footprint in the region. It has traditionally left that to Russia and instead pushes its role as a ‘soft’ security provider — one that brings security through economic investment. But China is now signalling it wants to play a more active security role in the region. Central Asia is the last buffer between it and the instability that is rocking much of the Muslim world at a time when Russia’s security sector is stretched thin by multiple military conflicts. 

China is reportedly building a military base on the Tajik–Afghan border, which will give it a security presence in both countries. It quietly increased security assistance to Kyrgyzstan after the 2016 bombing of the Chinese embassy in Bishkek and sells weapons to Turkmenistan. China has deep interests in these four countries, generally considered to be the least stable in the region. Three of them border China, while Turkmenistan is heavily indebted to Beijing and is China’s main supplier of gas.  

The Russia–China partnership in Central Asia remains generally stable for now. China’s deft diplomacy towards Russia — along with both states’ desires to keep the West out of their common backyard — has kept tensions behind closed doors. But with China now recognising it may need to strengthen its security posture in the region, it is unclear how long this stability will last.

This article was originally published by the East Asia Forum.

About the Author

Paul Stronski

Former Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program

Paul Stronski was a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program, where his research focuses on the relationship between Russia and neighboring countries in Central Asia and the South Caucasus.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Russia’s Growing Footprint in Africa’s Sahel Region

      Paul Stronski

  • Commentary
    Russia in the Balkans After Ukraine: A Troubling Actor

      Paul Stronski

Paul Stronski
Former Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
Paul Stronski
Foreign PolicyEast AsiaChinaCentral AsiaRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How the EU Can Become Energy Independent

    The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered a global energy crisis, but Europe is stuck in reaction mode. Without more strategic foresight, the EU will remain dependent on fossil fuels and will never be truly secure.

      Milo McBride, Pauline Gerard

  • Commentary
    Deciphering Europe’s Relationship with Turkey

    Debate is heating up on how Turkey could be integrated into a common European defense framework. Commercial and industrial deals offer a better chance at alignment than sweeping political efforts.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it Worth it for Europeans to Placate Trump?

    After spending much of 2025 trying to placate Donald Trump, some European leaders are starting to change posture. But is even a hostile Washington still so important to Europe that the U.S. president’s outbursts are worth putting up with?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europeans Are Quiet Quitting the United States

    European leaders have now not only lost faith in Donald Trump’s U.S. presidency, but also in America’s hegemony as a whole. But short-term challenges make an immediate divorce unwise.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Article
    EU Integration Without Ratification?

    Countries face several hurdles in joining the EU, including the final stage of ratifying their accession treaties. Procedural reforms and substantive adjustments could help move the process forward.

      Stefan Lehne

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.