Commentary
Sarah Yerkes
{
"authors": [
"Sarah Yerkes"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [
"Tunisia Monitor"
],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Tunisia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Political Islam in Tunisia: The History of Ennahda By Anne Wolf
The role of Tunisia’s primary Islamist party—Ennahda—within the country’s political scene ebbed and flowed both during and after the 2011 revolution. Understanding how Ennahda got to where it is today is crucial to understanding where it—and the country—is going.
By Sarah Yerkes
Published on Jun 4, 2019
Source: Journal of Islamic Studies
The role of Tunisia’s primary Islamist party—Ennahda—within the country’s political scene ebbed and flowed both during and after the 2011 revolution. Today, despite a parliamentary system with dozens of political parties in some form of power, Tunisia operates like a two-party democracy, with power vacillating between Ennahda and its primary rival, Nidaa Tounes. Understanding how Ennahda got to where it is today is crucial to understanding where it—and the country—is going.
While the party’s initial success was consistent with an Islamist wave that swept across the Arab Spring states in 2011–2012, Ennahda has continued to succeed where other Islamist parties in the region—particularly Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood—have dramatically failed. Anne Wolf’s book, Political Islam in Tunisia, offers a comprehensive overview of the history of Ennahda, examining not only the origins and evolution of this Islamist party but also the way the country has dealt with the highly contentious issue of what role religion should play in politics. The book tackles this question in today’s democratic context, but also provides the reader with a brief overview of the role religion played in the pre-independence period, as well as a longer treatment of the Bourguiba and Ben Ali eras....
This book review was originally published in the Journal of Islamic Studies.
About the Author
Sarah Yerkes
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Sarah Yerkes is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Middle East Program, where her research focuses on Tunisia’s political, economic, and security developments as well as state-society relations in the Middle East and North Africa.
- Nolan’s "The Odyssey" Has a Colonialism Problem
- Senegal: An Island of ResilienceOther
Sarah Yerkes, Natalie Triche
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- The Climate Blind Spot in Europe’s New Migration PactCommentary
The EU’s new migration policy is not suited to today’s realities. With climate change increasingly becoming a driver of displacement, Europe needs to rethink its deterrence-focused approach.
Shana Tabak
- EU Enlargement Forgets EuropeansCommentary
Preparing candidate countries for EU membership is no longer enough. As the enlargement process becomes a reality, the union must also prepare its own societies.
Iliriana Gjoni
- EU Integration Without Ratification?Article
Countries face several hurdles in joining the EU, including the final stage of ratifying their accession treaties. Procedural reforms and substantive adjustments could help move the process forward.
Stefan Lehne
- There Is No Shortcut for Europe in ArmeniaCommentary
Europe has an interest in supporting Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan as he tries to make peace with neighbors and loosen ties with Russia. But it is depersonalized support in the long term, not quickfire flash, that will win the day.
Thomas de Waal
- How to Join the EU in Three Easy StepsCommentary
Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.
Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni
