Commentary
- +1
Paul Haenle, Xue Gong, Ngeow Chow Bing, …
{
"authors": [
"Paul Haenle"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations",
"Carnegie China Commentaries"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": []
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
How Has the U.S.-China Relationship Changed Over Seventy Years?
Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the relationship between the two superpowers has been transformed.
By Paul Haenle
Published on Sep 30, 2019
Dramatic changes in China and the United States have caused tremors in the bilateral relationship. Shifts in Beijing’s domestic politics and foreign policy, combined with changes in Washington, are catapulting U.S.-China ties into a new era. There is a growing consensus in the United States that future relations with China will likely be dominated by economic, technological, and military competition.
At First, Open Distrust
For most of the first three decades after the founding of the People’s Republic of China on October 1, 1949, Washington saw Beijing as an ideological and military adversary. The victory of Mao Zedong’s Chinese Communist Party over the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang) coincided with the Cold War between Washington and Moscow. In the early years of Mao’s rule, the United States maintained official relations with the Nationalist Party government, whose leaders had fled to Taiwan.
On October 1, 1950, exactly one year later, U.S. soldiers crossed the Thirty-Eighth Parallel on the Korean Peninsula, entering North Korea. China would fight its first war as a sovereign nation against the United States a few weeks later—the Korean War.
A Tentative Friendship
In the 1960s, two important developments changed this trajectory. First, diplomatic relations between China and the Soviet Union became strained, at a time when Moscow loomed as Washington’s most threatening adversary. Second, the Sino-Soviet split led to new thinking in the United States about the potential benefits of improved relations with China.
Ping-pong diplomacy in the early 1970s ( a series of people-to-people exchanges involving table tennis players from the two countries), then secretary of state Henry Kissinger’s secret China visit, and former president Richard Nixon’s historic trip to China in 1972 all laid the foundation for the normalization of relations on January 1, 1979.
Reform and Opening Up
This was a turning point in the U.S.-China relationship. It coincided with Beijing’s monumental decision to begin economic reform and opening up. Chinese experts often note the Chinese decision was deeply intertwined with the normalization of bilateral relations. China’s reform and opening up brought great benefits to the Chinese people over the next several decades. Unsurprisingly, it also led to concomitant improvements in U.S.-China relations, including deeper people-to-people ties and economic links.
New Strains in the Relationship
In the fall of 2013, Beijing’s new leaders announced an ambitious set of economic reforms that led many to believe China’s process of reform and opening up would continue and even accelerate. These reforms were presented as being in line with the country’s national interests and aimed at driving its continued development.
Disappointingly, this process has stalled over the last several years, and in many cases, it has even been reversed. Not surprisingly, China’s economy is slowing down, U.S.-China relations are under great strain, and other developed nations are voicing concerns about Beijing’s changing domestic and international behavior. However, there is still a win-win solution to be had. If Beijing were to pursue reform and opening up, it could further its own development and help alleviate strains in relations with the United States and the world.
On October 1, 2019, China will celebrate the seventieth anniversary of its founding. This year also marks forty years since the beginning of China’s reform and opening up and the normalization of U.S.-China relations. One of the most important questions these anniversaries raise is: Will China continue to reform and open up?
This quick take is part of a series authored by scholars from across the Carnegie Endowment’s global network, in advance of the seventieth anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.
- How Has the U.S.-China Relationship Changed Over Seventy Years?
Paul Haenle - How China Became Russia’s Most Important Partner
Alexander Gabuev - How Has Europe’s View of the People’s Republic of China Changed?
Judy Dempsey - How Has China’s Role in the Middle East Evolved?
Maha Yahya - Three Lessons China Has Learned About Global Governance
Lyu Jinghua - A Brief History of India’s Relationship with the People’s Republic of China
Srinath Raghavan
About the Author
Paul Haenle
Former Maurice R. Greenberg Director’s Chair, Carnegie China
Paul Haenle held the Maurice R. Greenberg Director’s Chair at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and is a visiting senior research fellow at the East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore. He served as the White House China director on the National Security Council staffs of former presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
- Carnegie China Scholars on the Biden-Xi Meeting
- Biden and Xi Meet at APECQ&A
Paul Haenle, Chong Ja Ian
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Resetting Cyber Relations with the United StatesArticle
For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.
Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter
- Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?Commentary
EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Taking the Pulse: What Issue Is Europe Ignoring at Its Peril in 2026?Commentary
2026 has started in crisis, as the actions of unpredictable leaders shape an increasingly volatile global environment. To shift from crisis response to strategic foresight, what under-the-radar issues should the EU prepare for in the coming year?
Thomas de Waal
- China Is the Weak Link in Europe’s Ukraine StrategyCommentary
China plays an increasingly active role in the Kremlin’s hybrid war against Europe. The EU must confront this growing China-Russia cooperation, as it poses grave threats to both European security and economic resilience.
Maksym Beznosiuk
- Taking the Pulse: Has Europe Given Up its Leadership on Climate Change?Commentary
COP30 takes place amidst increased pessimism about the world’s commitment to energy transition and ecological protection. Beset by a host of other challenges, can Europe still maintain its role as a driver of global climate action?
Thomas de Waal
