• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Rudra Chaudhuri",
    "Shruti Sharma"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "India-U.S. Emerging Technologies Working Group"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [
    "Technology and Society"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "India",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie India

Bio-X: A New Frontier of Biotechnology Cooperation Under the iCET

India and the United States should consider launching “Bio-X,” to foster cooperation in biotechnology. This initiative would leverage the synergies between the domestic programs of the two countries, thereby boosting the competitiveness of their biotech industries.

Link Copied
By Rudra Chaudhuri and Shruti Sharma
Published on Jun 12, 2024
Project hero Image

Project

Technology and Society

This program focuses on five sets of imperatives: data, strategic technologies, emerging technologies, digital public infrastructure, and strategic partnerships.

Learn More

In December 2023, the national security advisers of India and the United States agreed to expand the scope of the iCET, or the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology, to encompass biotechnology. While a detailed agenda for this biotechnology cooperation under the iCET is yet to be defined, this presents a prime opportunity to propose initial discussion points before the next review meeting. These ideas could initially be incubated within the iCET framework—a bilateral mechanism to deepen technology and economic cooperation, and in time, be adapted into a wider framework involving other countries.

Much like the India-U.S. Defense Acceleration Ecosystem, or the INDUS-X—an innovation bridge for defense technology collaboration under the iCET, India and the United States should consider launching “Bio-X,” to foster cooperation in biotechnology. This initiative would leverage the synergies between the domestic programs of the two countries, thereby boosting the competitiveness of their biotech industries.

In many ways, Bio-X could be modeled loosely around the INDUS-X. Industry bodies, think tanks, and a wider ecosystem of bioincubators in India and the United States could shepherd this new initiative, anchored between the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) under the Indian Ministry of Science and Technology and its counterpart in the United States.

To start, Bio-X could focus on identifying shared objectives and aspirations in the biotechnology sector. The United States aims to boost biomanufacturing to expand its bioeconomy; India is also working towards scaling its biomanufacturing capacity to support its own. Bio-X could facilitate discussions on collaborative research to support bioeconomies, address challenges in commercializing bioproducts, explore funding mechanisms, and identify regulatory obstacles that impede collaborative research. Bio-X should include startups, industry leaders from small and large companies, academics, venture capitalists, biotech industry associations, policy researchers, lawyers, and regulatory agencies from both countries.

Initially, Bio-X could support the Implementation Arrangement (IA) between the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the DBT to develop biomanufacturing solutions. The IA promotes collaborative research in synthetic and engineering biology, systems and computational biology, and related fields, streamlining the selection and funding of joint research projects. However, information on research under the IA is often confined to researchers and grant-making organizations. Bio-X could be pivotal in breaking these information siloes, ensuring that policymakers, industry players, and other funding organizations and researchers are informed about ongoing projects to identify more opportunities for collaboration. This would help avoid research duplication, keep policymakers updated on emerging technologies, enable the development of new biomanufacturing solutions, promote translational research, and create a competitive market environment.

Securing adequate funding for projects outside the IA remains a challenge in both India and the United States. Despite the potential of the biotechnology sector, private investors often hesitate to fund early-stage biotech ventures due to the lengthy time before commercialization, compounded by bureaucratic delays in bioproduct approvals. Bio-X could connect researchers with the right funders and industry leaders to transform promising research into marketable products and services. In the long term, Bio-X could facilitate partnerships and technology transfer between companies and research institutions in the two countries.

Beyond funding, Bio-X could also serve as a primary touchpoint for policymakers to stay updated on advancements in the field while maintaining independent review protocols for bio-based products. Regular check-ins through Bio-X could enhance coordination among regulatory agencies in both countries, anticipating necessary measures and regulatory pathways for new bioproducts. This improved coordination would expedite approvals for bioproducts, encouraging private investors to support early-stage research.

Once operational, Bio-X could expand its scope to include workforce development in the bioeconomy and improve public awareness and acceptance of bio-based products and services. This would address systemic challenges across the entire value chain—from collaborative research to the development of publicly acceptable and commercially viable bio-based products.

About the Authors

Rudra Chaudhuri

Former Director, Carnegie India

Rudra Chaudhuri was the director of Carnegie India. His research focuses on the diplomatic history of South Asia, contemporary security issues, and the important role of emerging technologies and digital public infrastructure in diplomacy, statecraft, and development. He and his team at Carnegie India chair and convene the Global Technology Summit, co-hosted with the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.

Shruti Sharma

Former Associate Director, Fellow, and Chief Coordinator, Global Technology Summit, Technology and Society Program

Shruti Sharma was an associate director and a fellow with the Technology and Society Program at Carnegie India, where she is currently working on exploring the challenges and opportunities in leveraging biotechnology to improve public health capacity in India. Additionally, she is the Chief Coordinator of Carnegie India's Global Technology Summit.

Authors

Rudra Chaudhuri
Former Director, Carnegie India
Rudra Chaudhuri
Shruti Sharma
Former Associate Director, Fellow, and Chief Coordinator, Global Technology Summit, Technology and Society Program
Shruti Sharma
TechnologyIndiaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor Transition

    Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.

      Amanda Coakley

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Article
    What Can the EU Do About Trump 2.0?

    Europe’s policy of subservience to the Trump administration has failed. For Washington to take the EU seriously, its leaders now need to combine engagement with robust pushback.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe Falls Behind in the South Caucasus Connectivity Race

    The EU lacks leadership and strategic planning in the South Caucasus, while the United States is leading the charge. To secure its geopolitical interests, Brussels must invest in new connectivity for the region.

      Zaur Shiriyev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.